Duncan C. Lutes
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Environmental Engineering
- Insect Science
- Co-authors
- Robert E. KeaneJohn F. CarattiSharon M. HoodElizabeth D. ReinhardtJoe H. ScottChristopher W. WoodallS. P. UrbanskiRoger D. Ottmar
- Topics
- Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers)Forest ecology and management (8 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandFrance
In The Last Decade
Duncan C. Lutes
15 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Global and Planetary Change 187
- Ecology 98
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 76
- Environmental Engineering 37
- Insect Science 29
Countries citing papers authored by Duncan C. Lutes
This map shows the geographic impact of Duncan C. Lutes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Duncan C. Lutes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Duncan C. Lutes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Duncan C. Lutes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Duncan C. Lutes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Duncan C. Lutes. The network helps show where Duncan C. Lutes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Duncan C. Lutes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Duncan C. Lutes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Duncan C. Lutes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Duncan C. Lutes. Duncan C. Lutes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | Assessing three fuel classification systems and their maps using Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) surface fuel measurements | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | FuelCalc: A Method for Estimating Fuel Characteristics | 30 |
| 13 | Sensitivity Analysis of Down Woody Material Data Processing Routines | 4 |
| 14 | Assessment of the Line Transect Method: An Examination of the Spatial Patterns of Down and Standing Dead Wood 1 | 8 |
| 15 | Comparison of methods for the quantification of coarse woody debris and identification of its spatial scale| A study from the Tenderfoot Creek Experimental Forest, Montana | 3 |
About Duncan C. Lutes
Duncan C. Lutes is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Forest ecology and management (8 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (187 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (76 citations) and Ecology (98 citations). Duncan C. Lutes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Keane, John F. Caratti, Sharon M. Hood, Elizabeth D. Reinhardt, Joe H. Scott, Christopher W. Woodall, S. P. Urbanski, Roger D. Ottmar, Chris Toney and Christopher R. Keyes. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, International Journal of Wildland Fire and Journal of Forestry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.