Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Creating a System for Meeting the Fiber Requirements of Dairy Cows
19971.1k citationsD.R. MertensJournal of Dairy Scienceprofile →
Predicting Intake and Digestibility Using Mathematical Models of Ruminal Function
1987536 citationsD.R. MertensJournal of Animal Scienceprofile →
The Effect of Starch on Forage Fiber Digestion Kinetics In Vitro
1980476 citationsD.R. Mertens et al.Journal of Dairy Scienceprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D.R. Mertens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.R. Mertens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.R. Mertens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.R. Mertens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.R. Mertens. The network helps show where D.R. Mertens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.R. Mertens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.R. Mertens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.R. Mertens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D.R. Mertens. D.R. Mertens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hall, Mary Beth & D.R. Mertens. (2008). Effect of Sample Processing Procedures on Measurement of Starch in Corn Silage and Corn Grain. Insecta mundi. 17. 499–507.1 indexed citations
Harrison, J.H., et al.. (2006). Effect of yeast culture on efficiency of nutrient utilization for milk production and impact on fiber digestibility and fecal particle size. Journal of Animal Science. 84. 262–262.8 indexed citations
12.
Martin, Olivier, et al.. (2001). Influence de la digestion dans le rumen sur la composition des produits. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Dado, R.G., et al.. (1990). Effect of protein source on optimal dietary neutral detergent fiber levels for cows in early lactation.. Journal of Dairy Science. 73.2 indexed citations
16.
Dado, R.G., D.R. Mertens, & G.E. Shook. (1990). Theoretical metabolizable energy and protein requirements for milk component production.. Journal of Dairy Science. 73.2 indexed citations
Sudweeks, E. M., et al.. (1981). Assessing minimum amounts and form of roughages in ruminant diets: roughage value index system [Dairy cows].. Journal of Animal Science.3 indexed citations
20.
Wechsler, Francisco Stéfano, D.R. Mertens, R. D. Wyatt, & Harold M. Barnhart. (1980). Effect of administration site of aflatoxin on the production and health of lactating dairy cows.. Journal of Animal Science. 51. 407–408.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.