Doug Arthur

937 total citations
8 papers, 672 citations indexed

About

Doug Arthur is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Doug Arthur has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 672 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cancer Research, 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Doug Arthur's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers). Doug Arthur is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers). Doug Arthur collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Doug Arthur's co-authors include Frank A. Vicini, Martin Keisch, Julia White, Troy Scroggins, Oscar E. Streeter, Coral A. Quiet, Robert R. Kuske, Pamela R. Benitez, Peter Hedberg and V. Zannis and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Information Systems Research and The American Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Doug Arthur

8 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Doug Arthur United States 8 575 308 297 247 110 8 672
S.B. Motwani United States 11 393 0.7× 97 0.3× 136 0.5× 272 1.1× 145 1.3× 25 587
Gill Ross United Kingdom 7 324 0.6× 236 0.8× 85 0.3× 70 0.3× 178 1.6× 13 577
Abram Recht United States 12 976 1.7× 66 0.2× 741 2.5× 276 1.1× 399 3.6× 15 1.1k
George Papadatos Australia 8 360 0.6× 75 0.2× 168 0.6× 102 0.4× 261 2.4× 15 505
Marianne Kyndi Denmark 11 626 1.1× 36 0.1× 312 1.1× 175 0.7× 458 4.2× 19 863
Daniel Hans France 9 1.1k 2.0× 65 0.2× 805 2.7× 380 1.5× 515 4.7× 18 1.3k
Amy Cyr United States 16 420 0.7× 42 0.1× 281 0.9× 246 1.0× 178 1.6× 46 607
J. A. Andersen Denmark 5 472 0.8× 39 0.1× 285 1.0× 150 0.6× 300 2.7× 9 651
Lars-Gunnar Arnesson Sweden 7 470 0.8× 35 0.1× 311 1.0× 131 0.5× 287 2.6× 8 587
Ron Koelemij Netherlands 13 224 0.4× 54 0.2× 145 0.5× 102 0.4× 197 1.8× 22 469

Countries citing papers authored by Doug Arthur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doug Arthur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doug Arthur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doug Arthur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doug Arthur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doug Arthur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doug Arthur. The network helps show where Doug Arthur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doug Arthur

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doug Arthur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doug Arthur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doug Arthur. Doug Arthur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
2.
Khan, Atif J., Peter Y. Chen, Catheryn M. Yashar, et al.. (2019). Three-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Delivered With Brachytherapy Applicators Is Feasible and Safe: First Results From the TRIUMPH-T Trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 104(1). 67–74. 40 indexed citations
3.
Rabinovitch, Rachel, Kathryn Winter, Robert R. Kuske, et al.. (2013). RTOG 95-17, a Phase II trial to evaluate brachytherapy as the sole method of radiation therapy for Stage I and II breast carcinoma—year-5 toxicity and cosmesis. Brachytherapy. 13(1). 17–22. 42 indexed citations
4.
Wilkinson, J. Ben, Peter D. Beitsch, Chirag Shah, et al.. (2012). Evaluation of Current Consensus Statement Recommendations for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A Pooled Analysis of William Beaumont Hospital and American Society of Breast Surgeon MammoSite Registry Trial Data. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 85(5). 1179–1185. 33 indexed citations
5.
Choudhury, Vivek, et al.. (2010). IT Careers Camp: An Early Intervention Strategy to Increase IS Enrollments. Information Systems Research. 21(1). 1–14. 32 indexed citations
6.
Benitez, Pamela R., Martin Keisch, Frank A. Vicini, et al.. (2007). Five-year results: the initial clinical trial of Mammosite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer. The American Journal of Surgery. 194(4). 456–462. 183 indexed citations
7.
Benitez, Pamela R., Oscar E. Streeter, Frank A. Vicini, et al.. (2006). Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study. The American Journal of Surgery. 192(4). 427–433. 55 indexed citations
8.
Keisch, Martin, Frank A. Vicini, Robert R. Kuske, et al.. (2003). Initial clinical experience with the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator in women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 55(2). 289–293. 280 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026