Practical Radiation Oncology

1.5k papers and 19.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Practical Radiation Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 19.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Practical Radiation Oncology usually cover Radiation (687 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (652 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (524 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (685 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (174 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Practical Radiation Oncology are Carol A. Hahn, Simon S. Lo, Benjamin D. Smith, Lawrence B. Marks, Louis Potters, Stephen Lutz, Alphonse G. Taghian, Benedick A. Fraass, George Rodrigues and Jay R. Harris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Practical Radiation Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Practical Radiation Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Practical Radiation Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Practical Radiation Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Practical Radiation Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Practical Radiation Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical Radiation Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025