Daniel J. Scanderbeg

60 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Scanderbeg
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Radiation 453
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 304
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 301
  • Cancer Research 193
  • Reproductive Medicine 63
Replace Nilendu Gupta with:
Nilendu Gupta United States
Yeon‐Sil Kim South Korea
Masanori Someya Japan
Wui‐Jin Koh United States
Joseph F. Montebello United States
Koh‐ichi Sakata Japan
Jan Halle United States
Kazuhisa Furutani Japan
Christina Aquino‐Parsons Canada
Theodore L. Phillips United States
Daniel J. Scanderbeg relative to Nilendu Gupta United States Nilendu Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nilendu Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Scanderbeg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Scanderbeg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Scanderbeg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Scanderbeg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Scanderbeg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Scanderbeg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Scanderbeg. The network helps show where Daniel J. Scanderbeg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Scanderbeg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Scanderbeg Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Scanderbeg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201174
2 201568
3 201963
4 201053
5 200847
6 201246
7 201044
8 201541
9 201241
10 202239
11 201438
12 201634
13 202034
14 201327
15 201325
16 201924
17 200923
18 201621
19 201220
20 200320

About Daniel J. Scanderbeg

Daniel J. Scanderbeg is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cancer Research, having authored 65 papers that have together received 968 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (35 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (18 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (17 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (11 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (8 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (453 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (304 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (301 citations), Cancer Research (193 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (63 citations). Daniel J. Scanderbeg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Catheryn M. Yashar, Cheryl Saenz, Todd Pawlicki, R Rice, Sameer K. Nath, William Y. Song, Dae Yup Han, Sunil J. Advani, Arno J. Mundt and Jyoti Mayadev. Their work appears in journals such as Brachytherapy, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Medical Physics, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact