Julia White

12.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
185 papers, 6.6k citations indexed

About

Julia White is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia White has authored 185 papers receiving a total of 6.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 136 papers in Cancer Research, 76 papers in Oncology and 47 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Julia White's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (134 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (46 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (45 papers). Julia White is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (134 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (46 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (45 papers). Julia White collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Julia White's co-authors include Frank A. Vicini, Douglas W. Arthur, Benjamin D. Smith, Jay R. Harris, Rachel Rabinovitch, X. Allen Li, Bruce G. Haffty, Alphonse G. Taghian, Robert R. Kuske and Thomas A. Buchholz and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Genetics, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Julia White

174 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Hit Papers

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Consensus Statemen... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 2018 2016 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia White United States 40 4.7k 2.3k 2.2k 2.2k 1.6k 185 6.6k
Douglas W. Arthur United States 39 3.9k 0.8× 2.2k 1.0× 1.3k 0.6× 1.8k 0.8× 1.6k 1.0× 121 5.0k
Pauline T. Truong Canada 41 3.1k 0.7× 1.1k 0.5× 2.0k 0.9× 1.6k 0.7× 1.4k 0.9× 174 5.3k
Candace R. Correa United States 16 5.0k 1.1× 3.1k 1.4× 2.4k 1.1× 1.5k 0.7× 1.2k 0.7× 24 8.7k
Csaba Polgár Hungary 30 3.0k 0.6× 1.7k 0.8× 1.0k 0.5× 1.6k 0.7× 1.4k 0.8× 210 4.2k
Youlia Kirova France 37 2.2k 0.5× 1.0k 0.5× 2.1k 0.9× 1.2k 0.5× 662 0.4× 325 5.0k
Barbara Fowble United States 46 4.5k 1.0× 649 0.3× 1.8k 0.8× 3.1k 1.4× 1.9k 1.1× 137 5.8k
J.J. Jager Netherlands 23 2.5k 0.5× 962 0.4× 1.1k 0.5× 1.4k 0.6× 994 0.6× 51 3.8k
M. Piérart France 33 3.0k 0.6× 2.2k 1.0× 2.4k 1.1× 1.3k 0.6× 3.0k 1.8× 69 10.7k
Jacques Borger Netherlands 29 2.2k 0.5× 1.1k 0.5× 1.0k 0.5× 1.1k 0.5× 716 0.4× 62 3.6k
Larry L. Kestin United States 60 4.0k 0.9× 5.9k 2.6× 1.3k 0.6× 1.8k 0.8× 1.7k 1.0× 240 10.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Julia White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia White. The network helps show where Julia White may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia White

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia White. Julia White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
4.
Palm, Russell F., et al.. (2024). The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy. Cancers. 16(11). 2122–2122. 4 indexed citations
5.
Pusztai, Lajos, Peter Dubsky, Thomas Bachelot, et al.. (2023). De Novo Oligometastatic Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 41(34). 5237–5241. 3 indexed citations
6.
White, Julia, Noah D. Goodman, & Robert D. Hawkins. (2022). Mixed-effects transformers for hierarchical adaptation. 3944–3954. 1 indexed citations
7.
White, Julia, Kathryn Winter, Reena S. Cecchini, et al.. (2019). Cosmetic Outcome from Post Lumpectomy Whole Breast Irradiation (WBI) Versus Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) on the NRG Oncology/NSABP B39-RTOG 0413 Phase III Clinical Trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 105(1). S3–S4. 29 indexed citations
8.
Li, X. Allen, Jennifer Moughan, Julia White, et al.. (2019). Patterns of Failure Observed in the 2-Step Institution Credentialing Process for NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1005 (NCT01349322) and Lessons Learned. Practical Radiation Oncology. 10(4). 265–273. 5 indexed citations
9.
White, Julia, Kathryn Winter, Robert R. Kuske, et al.. (2016). Long-Term Cancer Outcomes From Study NRG Oncology/RTOG 9517: A Phase 2 Study of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter Brachytherapy After Lumpectomy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 95(5). 1460–1465. 40 indexed citations
10.
Bazan, Jose G., et al.. (2016). Likelihood of unacceptable normal tissue doses in breast cancer patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation in routine clinical practice. Practical Radiation Oncology. 7(3). 154–160. 11 indexed citations
11.
Woodward, Wendy A., Nour Sneige, Kathryn Winter, et al.. (2014). Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 67(9). 777–780. 3 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Guang‐Pei, Feng Liu, Julia White, et al.. (2014). A planning comparison of 7 irradiation options allowed in RTOG 1005 for early-stage breast cancer. Medical dosimetry. 40(1). 21–25. 17 indexed citations
13.
Rabinovitch, Rachel, Kathryn Winter, Robert R. Kuske, et al.. (2013). RTOG 95-17, a Phase II trial to evaluate brachytherapy as the sole method of radiation therapy for Stage I and II breast carcinoma—year-5 toxicity and cosmesis. Brachytherapy. 13(1). 17–22. 42 indexed citations
14.
White, Julia & John L. Meyer. (2011). Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: Advances in Whole and Partial Breast Treatment. Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology. 43. 292–314. 4 indexed citations
15.
Bovi, Joseph & Julia White. (2011). Radiation Therapy in the Prevention of Brain Metastases. Current Oncology Reports. 14(1). 55–62. 17 indexed citations
16.
Ahunbay, E, et al.. (2011). Interfractional Target Variations for Partial Breast Irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 82(5). 1594–1604. 12 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Benjamin D., Søren M. Bentzen, Candace R. Correa, et al.. (2010). Fractionation for Whole Breast Irradiation: An American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Evidence-Based Guideline. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 81(1). 59–68. 289 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Benjamin D., Douglas W. Arthur, Thomas A. Buchholz, et al.. (2009). Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Consensus Statement From the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 74(4). 987–1001. 621 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Ahunbay, E, et al.. (2007). Direct aperture optimization–based intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole breast irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 67(4). 1248–1258. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026