Dorothy Warburton
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Genetics top 1%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jennie KlineZena SteinStephen BrownA.S. HendersonMervyn SusserP. DunnillM. D. LillyK.C. Atwood
- Topics
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (27 papers)Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (22 papers)Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Dorothy Warburton
90 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Genetics 1.3k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.3k
- Plant Science 725
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 575
Countries citing papers authored by Dorothy Warburton
This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothy Warburton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothy Warburton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothy Warburton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothy Warburton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothy Warburton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothy Warburton. The network helps show where Dorothy Warburton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorothy Warburton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorothy Warburton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorothy Warburton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dorothy Warburton. Dorothy Warburton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 71 | |
| 4 | 108 | |
| 5 | 85 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 79 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 130 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Dorothy Warburton
Dorothy Warburton is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (27 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (22 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.3k citations), Genetics (1.3k citations) and Developmental Biology (86 citations). Dorothy Warburton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jennie Kline, Zena Stein, Stephen Brown, A.S. Henderson, Mervyn Susser, P. Dunnill, M. D. Lilly, K.C. Atwood, Kwame Anyane‐Yeboa and Chih‐Yu Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, New England Journal of Medicine and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.