Dorota Czerucka
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Patrick RampalT. PicheStéphanie DahanJean‐François PeyronVéronique ImbertGuillaume DalmassoRodolphe Pontier-BresBernard Rossi
- Topics
- Escherichia coli research studies (8 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (7 papers)Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceMonacoUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dorota Czerucka
36 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Food Science 1.0k
- Molecular Biology 919
- Nutrition and Dietetics 457
- Infectious Diseases 428
- Endocrinology 254
Countries citing papers authored by Dorota Czerucka
This map shows the geographic impact of Dorota Czerucka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorota Czerucka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorota Czerucka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dorota Czerucka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorota Czerucka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorota Czerucka. The network helps show where Dorota Czerucka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorota Czerucka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorota Czerucka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorota Czerucka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dorota Czerucka. Dorota Czerucka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 79 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 91 | |
| 14 | 437 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 141 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 111 | |
| 19 | [Response of the IRD intestinal epithelial cell line to Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in rats. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii]. | 11 |
| 20 | 28 |
About Dorota Czerucka
Dorota Czerucka is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Food Science and Biotechnology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Escherichia coli research studies (8 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (7 papers) and Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (1.0k citations), Endocrinology (254 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (457 citations). Dorota Czerucka has collaborated with scholars based in France, Monaco and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Rampal, T. Piche, Stéphanie Dahan, Jean‐François Peyron, Véronique Imbert, Guillaume Dalmasso, Rodolphe Pontier-Bres, Bernard Rossi, Baharia Mograbi and Patricia Lagadec. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.