Dong Phil Choi
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Hyeon Chang KimIl SuhMyung Ha LeeJu Mi LeeSong Vogue AhnSun Min OhJee‐Seon ShimYumie Rhee
- Topics
- Nutritional Studies and Diet (6 papers)Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (6 papers)Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dong Phil Choi
27 papers receiving 588 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 154
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 142
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 128
- Epidemiology 127
- Physiology 119
Countries citing papers authored by Dong Phil Choi
This map shows the geographic impact of Dong Phil Choi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dong Phil Choi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dong Phil Choi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dong Phil Choi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dong Phil Choi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dong Phil Choi. The network helps show where Dong Phil Choi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dong Phil Choi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dong Phil Choi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dong Phil Choi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dong Phil Choi. Dong Phil Choi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | Development and Assessment of Protective Boots for Swine Farmers | 0 |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About Dong Phil Choi
Dong Phil Choi is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (6 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (6 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (154 citations), Nephrology (54 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (142 citations). Dong Phil Choi has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hyeon Chang Kim, Il Suh, Myung Ha Lee, Ju Mi Lee, Song Vogue Ahn, Sun Min Oh, Jee‐Seon Shim, Yumie Rhee, Hye Min Cho and Bo Song. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Epidemiology and Clinica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.