Dona E.C. Locke
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bryan K. WoodruffEric M. ReimanAmylou C. DueckRichard J. CaselliCharlene Hoffman‐SnyderCynthia M. StonningtonDavid OsborneKatherine H. Noe
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (38 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (17 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (11 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaPuerto Rico
In The Last Decade
Dona E.C. Locke
79 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.3k
- Physiology 591
- Cognitive Neuroscience 389
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 271
- Clinical Psychology 268
Countries citing papers authored by Dona E.C. Locke
This map shows the geographic impact of Dona E.C. Locke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dona E.C. Locke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dona E.C. Locke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dona E.C. Locke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dona E.C. Locke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dona E.C. Locke. The network helps show where Dona E.C. Locke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dona E.C. Locke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dona E.C. Locke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dona E.C. Locke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dona E.C. Locke. Dona E.C. Locke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 209 |
About Dona E.C. Locke
Dona E.C. Locke is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Rehabilitation, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (38 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (17 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (44 citations) and Physiology (591 citations). Dona E.C. Locke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Bryan K. Woodruff, Eric M. Reiman, Amylou C. Dueck, Richard J. Caselli, Charlene Hoffman‐Snyder, Cynthia M. Stonnington, David Osborne, Katherine H. Noe, Steven Z. Rapcsak and Gene E. Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.