Don Higginbotham

912 citations
55 papers · 235 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Don Higginbotham

38 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers

Don Higginbotham
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Anthropology 57
  • Marketing 45
  • Political Science and International Relations 113
  • History 29
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
Replace Joan R. Gundersen with:
Joan R. Gundersen United States
Robert M. Weir United States
Robert McColley United States
David Thomas Konig United States
Lawrence Delbert Cress United States
Suzanne Lebsock United States
Christine Leigh Heyrman United States
Merton L. Dillon United States
Emma Lou Thornbrough United States
Jane H. Pease United States
Don Higginbotham relative to Joan R. Gundersen United States Joan R. Gundersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Joan R. Gundersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Don Higginbotham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Don Higginbotham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Higginbotham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Higginbotham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Don Higginbotham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Higginbotham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Higginbotham. The network helps show where Don Higginbotham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Don Higginbotham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Don Higginbotham Line = papers co-authored together Don Higginbotham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196240
2 199730
3 198029
4 199810
5 19989
6 19729
7 19838
8 19838
9 20026
10 19875
11 19895
12 20025
13 19774
14 20014
15 19664
16 19884
17 19723
18 19783
19 20023
20 19673

About Don Higginbotham

Don Higginbotham is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 55 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (35 papers), American History and Culture (8 papers), Military and Defense Studies (4 papers), Military History and Strategy (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers) and American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (57 citations), Marketing (45 citations), Political Science and International Relations (113 citations), History (29 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations). Don Higginbotham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Quarles, Thomas D. Morris, Charles Royster, Pauline Maier, Robert W. Coakley, Robert Middlekauff, John Phillip Reid, John Ferling, Richard B. Morris and Stephen Conway. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, Journal of American History, The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact