Don Foster

50 papers receiving 870 citations

Peers

Don Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Psychology 38
  • Gender Studies 171
  • Sociology and Political Science 522
  • Social Psychology 211
  • Clinical Psychology 170
Replace Catriona Ida Macleod with:
Catriona Ida Macleod South Africa
Amanda LeCouteur Australia
Ruby Takanishi United States
Cathy Urwin United Kingdom
Jane McCabe New Zealand
Lillian B. Rubin United States
Jean E. Veevers Canada
Barbara Tomlinson United States
Sylvia D. Hoffert United States
Patrick R. Grzanka United States
Don Foster relative to Catriona Ida Macleod South Africa Catriona Ida Macleod's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Catriona Ida Macleod · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Don Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Don Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Don Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Foster. The network helps show where Don Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Don Foster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Don Foster Line = papers co-authored together Don Foster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Social psychology in South Africa.
1991129
2 2007112
3 201372
4 199756
5 200147
6 199438
7
The theatre of violence : narratives of protagonists in the South African conflict
200537
8 200036
9 199735
10 199130
11 200130
12 199729
13
Detention and Torture in South Africa
198728
14
Detention & torture in South Africa: Psychological, legal & historical studies
198725
15 199824
16 200720
17 198418
18 201118
19 201217
20 198616

About Don Foster

Don Foster is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Law, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), South African History and Culture (6 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (6 papers), Community Health and Development (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (38 citations), Gender Studies (171 citations), Sociology and Political Science (522 citations), Social Psychology (211 citations) and Clinical Psychology (170 citations). Don Foster has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Joha Louw‐Potgieter, Melissa Steyn, Kevin Durrheim, John Dixon, Rachelle Chadwick, Tamara Shefer, Colin Tredoux, Russell Luyt, Dennis Davis and Anna Strebel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, South African Journal of Psychology, Culture Health & Sexuality, Economy and Society and Discourse & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact