Dolores Vigil
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Jesús López‐HerceSantiago MencíaCésar SánchezÁngel CarrilloMaría José SantiagoAmaya BustinzaSilvia Sánchez‐RamónEduardo Fernández‐Cruz
- Topics
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (5 papers)Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (4 papers)Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesIntensive Care MedicineEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Partner nations
- Spain
In The Last Decade
Dolores Vigil
16 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Nutrition and Dietetics 127
- Surgery 73
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 60
- Psychiatry and Mental health 51
- Physiology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Dolores Vigil
This map shows the geographic impact of Dolores Vigil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dolores Vigil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dolores Vigil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dolores Vigil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dolores Vigil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dolores Vigil. The network helps show where Dolores Vigil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dolores Vigil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dolores Vigil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dolores Vigil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dolores Vigil. Dolores Vigil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | Legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado en radiología vascular e intervencionista | 3 |
About Dolores Vigil
Dolores Vigil is a scholar working on Family Practice, Nephrology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (5 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (4 papers) and Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (127 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (32 citations) and Nephrology (27 citations). Dolores Vigil has collaborated with scholars based in Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jesús López‐Herce, Santiago Mencía, César Sánchez, Ángel Carrillo, María José Santiago, Amaya Bustinza, Silvia Sánchez‐Ramón, Eduardo Fernández‐Cruz, Carol Aristimuño and M L Martínez-Ginés. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Intensive Care Medicine and European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.