Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review
This map shows the geographic impact of Dinesh Singh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinesh Singh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinesh Singh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinesh Singh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinesh Singh. The network helps show where Dinesh Singh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dinesh Singh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dinesh Singh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dinesh Singh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dinesh Singh. Dinesh Singh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Singh, Dinesh, et al.. (2020). Effect of climate change on sugarcane crop: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 9. 255–261.1 indexed citations
Singh, R. P., et al.. (2016). Yield Gap Analysis of Potato Through Front Line Demonstration. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development. 11(1). 53–56.1 indexed citations
Singh, Dinesh, et al.. (2014). Adoption level of Integrated pest management technology in chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes. 27(2). 170–173.1 indexed citations
13.
Asrey, Ram, et al.. (2012). Combinational impact of Debaryomyces hansenii bioagent and 1-methylecyclopropen (1-MCP) on shelf life and quality attributes of Kinnow mandarin.. HortFlora research spectrum. 1(2). 103–109.6 indexed citations
14.
Singh, Dinesh, et al.. (2011). Beneficial effects of pre-harvest carbendazim and calcium nitrate sprays in kinnow (Citrus nobilis × C. deliciosa) storage*. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 81(5).2 indexed citations
15.
Singh, Dinesh, et al.. (2009). Studies on transportation losses and quality parameters in apple packed in different containers. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 66(2). 245–248.1 indexed citations
16.
Singh, Dinesh, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Mohar Singh, & Vikas Sharma. (2009). Characterization of pecan (Carya illinoensis) germplasm of seedling origin through regression and principal component analysis. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 79(4). 324–326.
17.
Tomar, R. K., Dinesh Singh, K. S. Gangwar, et al.. (2006). Influence of tillage systems and moisture regimes on soil physical environment, growth and productivity of rice-wheat system in upper gangetic plains of Western Uttar Pradesh. 1. 146–150.5 indexed citations
Singh, Dinesh & A. K. Thakur. (2003). Effect of pre-harvest sprays of fungicides and Calcium nitrate on post-harvest rot of kinnow in low temperature storage. Plant Disease Research. 18(1). 9–11.5 indexed citations
20.
Singh, Dinesh, et al.. (2002). Suppression of green mould rot caused by Penicillium digitatum in kinnow fruits by hot water immersion treatment. Indian Phytopathology. 55(3). 282–285.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.