Dieter Fleck
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Philosophy
- Co-authors
- Michaël BotheWilliam H. BoothbyTerry D. Gill
- Topics
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics (20 papers)International Law and Human Rights (16 papers)Nuclear Issues and Defense (8 papers)
- Journals
- International Review of the Red CrossJournal of International Criminal JusticeNordic Journal of International Law
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustriaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dieter Fleck
27 papers receiving 90 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Political Science and International Relations 137
- Sociology and Political Science 53
- History 18
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 11
- Philosophy 11
Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Fleck
This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Fleck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Fleck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Fleck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Fleck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Fleck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Fleck. The network helps show where Dieter Fleck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dieter Fleck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dieter Fleck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dieter Fleck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dieter Fleck. Dieter Fleck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | Individual and State Responsibility for Intelligence Gathering | 4 |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts | 64 |
| 17 | Handbuch des humanitären Völkerrechts in bewaffneten Konflikten | 4 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Dieter Fleck
Dieter Fleck is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 38 papers that have together received 166 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (20 papers), International Law and Human Rights (16 papers) and Nuclear Issues and Defense (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (137 citations), Space and Planetary Science (4 citations) and History (18 citations). Dieter Fleck has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Bothe, William H. Boothby and Terry D. Gill. Their work appears in journals such as International Review of the Red Cross, Journal of International Criminal Justice and Nordic Journal of International Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.