This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Crook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Crook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Crook more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Crook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Crook. The network helps show where John R. Crook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Crook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Crook.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Crook based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Crook. John R. Crook is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Crook, John R.. (2014). In re Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Pakistan v. India). American Journal of International Law. 108(2). 308–314.1 indexed citations
2.
Crook, John R.. (2013). U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Hague Child Abduction Case, Urges Speed by Lower Courts in Such Cases. American Journal of International Law. 107(2). 471–474.
3.
Crook, John R.. (2013). President Obama Outlines Shifts in U.S. Counterterrorism Policy. American Journal of International Law. 107(3). 674–679.1 indexed citations
4.
Crook, John R.. (2013). U.S. Government Responds to Poor Working Conditions in Bangladesh’s Garment Industry. American Journal of International Law. 107(4). 936–939.1 indexed citations
5.
Crook, John R.. (2012). The War Powers Resolution-- A Dim and Fading Legacy. Case Western Reserve journal of international law. 45(1). 157.
6.
Crook, John R.. (2012). U.S. Official Describes U.S. Policy Toward International Criminal Court. American Journal of International Law. 106(2). 384–386.1 indexed citations
7.
Crook, John R.. (2012). Twenty-Fifth anniversary of the missile technology control regime. American Journal of International Law. 106(3). 676–678.
Crook, John R.. (2009). Government of Sudan and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement / Army Abyei Arbitration Award - Introductory Note. International Legal Materials. 1254–1423.2 indexed citations
Crook, John R.. (2007). Continuing U.S. Efforts to Discourage Iran¿s Nuclear Program. American Journal of International Law. 101(3). 666–667.
13.
Crook, John R.. (2007). UCMJ Proceedings Against U.S. Personnel Accused of Offenses Against Civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq. American Journal of International Law. 101(3). 663–664.1 indexed citations
Crook, John R.. (2005). CONTEMPORARY PRACTICE OF THE UNITED STATES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL LAW: United States Abstains on Security Council Resolution Authorizing Referral of Darfur Atrocities to International Criminal Court. American Journal of International Law. 99(3). 691–693.1 indexed citations
16.
Crook, John R.. (2005). U.S. Strategy for Responding to ICJ's Avena Decision. American Journal of International Law. 99(2). 489–492.
17.
Crook, John R.. (2004). The International Court of Justice and Human Rights. 1(1). 1.8 indexed citations
18.
Crook, John R.. (2003). Treaties, International Law, and Constitutional Rights. Stanford Law Review. 55(5). 1999–2028.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.