Diana Thomas
- Physiology top 2%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth ElliottGéraldine NaughtonLouise A. BaurJ. R. BrotherhoodJennie Brand‐MillerJonathan E. MarkowitzElizabeth PeadonCatherine Taylor
- Topics
- Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers)Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers)Food composition and properties (2 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Clinical NutritionCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsBritish Journal Of Nutrition
- Partner nations
- AustraliaFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Diana Thomas
11 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Physiology 811
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 537
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 453
- Cell Biology 254
- Nutrition and Dietetics 225
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Thomas. The network helps show where Diana Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Thomas. Diana Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | Practical medical procedures at a glance | 4 |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 138 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 246 | |
| 8 | 285 | |
| 9 | Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitusbreakdown → | 561 |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 191 |
About Diana Thomas
Diana Thomas is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Physiology and Cell Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers) and Food composition and properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (537 citations), Physiology (811 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (152 citations). Diana Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Elliott, Géraldine Naughton, Louise A. Baur, J. R. Brotherhood, Jennie Brand‐Miller, Jonathan E. Markowitz, Elizabeth Peadon and Catherine Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and British Journal Of Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.