Diana M. Barnes
- Oncology top 1%
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 18
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 16
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 7
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 6
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 8
- Genetics top 5%
- Estrogen and related hormone effects 9
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 6
-
- Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research 11
- Co-authors
- Cheryl GillettRosemary R. MillisAndrew M. HanbyPaul SmithGordon PetersEdwin A. DublinWilliam H. HarrisWilliam J. Gullick
- Journals
- Science (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Diana M. Barnes
58 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Oncology 1.8k
- Cancer Research 939
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 478
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Genetics 636
Countries citing papers authored by Diana M. Barnes
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana M. Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana M. Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana M. Barnes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana M. Barnes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana M. Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana M. Barnes. The network helps show where Diana M. Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana M. Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 121 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 56 | |
| 6 | Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. | 1999 | 195 |
| 7 | 1998 | 67 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 99 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 86 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 51 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 277 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 45 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 36 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 123 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 78 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 68 |
About Diana M. Barnes
Diana M. Barnes is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (18 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (16 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (11 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (7 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.8k citations), Cancer Research (939 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (478 citations). Diana M. Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl Gillett, Rosemary R. Millis, Andrew M. Hanby, Paul Smith, Gordon Peters, Edwin A. Dublin, William H. Harris, William J. Gullick, Walter M. Gregory and Michael Richards. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.