Diana M. Barnes
- Oncology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Cheryl GillettRosemary R. MillisAndrew M. HanbyPaul SmithGordon PetersEdwin A. DublinWilliam H. HarrisWilliam J. Gullick
- Topics
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (18 papers)HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (16 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Diana M. Barnes
58 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Oncology 1.8k
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Cancer Research 939
- Genetics 636
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 478
Countries citing papers authored by Diana M. Barnes
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana M. Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana M. Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana M. Barnes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana M. Barnes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana M. Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana M. Barnes. The network helps show where Diana M. Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana M. Barnes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana M. Barnes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana M. Barnes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana M. Barnes. Diana M. Barnes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 59 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 121 | |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. | 195 |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 99 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 86 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 277 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 123 | |
| 19 | 78 | |
| 20 | 68 |
About Diana M. Barnes
Diana M. Barnes is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (18 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (16 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.8k citations), Cancer Research (939 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (478 citations). Diana M. Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl Gillett, Rosemary R. Millis, Andrew M. Hanby, Paul Smith, Gordon Peters, Edwin A. Dublin, William H. Harris, William J. Gullick, Walter M. Gregory and Michael Richards. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.