Peter Hunt

1.4k citations
30 papers · 347 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Themes in Literature Analysis 22
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 3
    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics 3
    • Short Stories in Global Literature 1
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 5

Peter Hunt

24 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Peter Hunt
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Literature and Literary Theory 180
  • Anthropology 55
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 21
  • Gender Studies 36
  • Classics 11
Replace Zohar Shavit with:
Zohar Shavit Israel
James Smith Allen United States
Paul Lauter United States
Jean Alter United States
Colin Nicholson United Kingdom
B. F. Dick
Robert E. Morsberger United States
Virgil Nemoianu United States
Uma Parameswaran Canada
Paul Sharrad Australia
Peter Hunt relative to Zohar Shavit Israel Zohar Shavit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Zohar Shavit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hunt. The network helps show where Peter Hunt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hunt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hunt Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hunt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199472
2 200352
3 198434
4
Children's Literature: The Development of Criticism
199034
5 199934
6
Alternative Worlds in Fantasy Fiction
200124
7 201018
8 200013
9 199610
10 20018
11 19878
12
Children's Literature: An Anthology 1801 - 1902
20006
13 19976
14 19994
15 19883
16 19873
17 19903
18 19813
19
Exploding the canon: children's literature and the revolution in criticism
20032
20 19952

About Peter Hunt

Peter Hunt is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Education, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Themes in Literature Analysis (22 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper) and Short Stories in Global Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (180 citations), Anthropology (55 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (21 citations), Gender Studies (36 citations) and Classics (11 citations). Peter Hunt has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Trevett and Stewart Flory. Their work appears in journals such as Children's Literature Association quarterly, Children s Literature in Education, ˜The œLion and the unicorn, Phoenix and Mnemosyne.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact