Diana A. Aston
- Oncology top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Dermatology top 2%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Jennifer J. KristiansenDavid K. AhnElizabeth A. HollyRosemary D. CressCaroline M. TannerJ. William LangstonSamuel M. GoldmanDevron H. Char
- Topics
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (5 papers)Ocular Oncology and Treatments (4 papers)Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers)
- Cited by
- DermatologyOphthalmologyNeurology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Diana A. Aston
20 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Oncology 408
- Neurology 293
- Epidemiology 235
- Dermatology 208
- Surgery 207
Countries citing papers authored by Diana A. Aston
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana A. Aston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana A. Aston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana A. Aston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana A. Aston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana A. Aston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana A. Aston. The network helps show where Diana A. Aston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana A. Aston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana A. Aston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana A. Aston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana A. Aston. Diana A. Aston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 49 | |
| 3 | 126 | |
| 4 | 110 | |
| 5 | 85 | |
| 6 | 82 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 125 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Detection of mutagens in cervical mucus in smokers and nonsmokers. | 11 |
| 12 | Characteristics of women by smoking status in the San Francisco Bay Area. | 12 |
| 13 | 81 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | Uveal melanoma, hormonal and reproductive factors in women. | 34 |
| 17 | Uveal melanoma in relation to ultraviolet light exposure and host factors. | 116 |
| 18 | 192 | |
| 19 | Cardiotoxicity of epirubicin and doxorubicin: assessment by endomyocardial biopsy. | 163 |
| 20 | 21 |
About Diana A. Aston
Diana A. Aston is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Immunology and Allergy and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (5 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (4 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (208 citations), Ophthalmology (188 citations) and Neurology (293 citations). Diana A. Aston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer J. Kristiansen, David K. Ahn, Elizabeth A. Holly, Rosemary D. Cress, Caroline M. Tanner, Elizabeth A. Holly, J. William Langston, Samuel M. Goldman, Caroline M. Tanner and Elizabeth A. Holly. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and American Journal of Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.