Denise Tanner

58 papers receiving 940 citations

Peers

Denise Tanner
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 61
  • Public Administration 112
  • General Health Professions 423
  • Demography 108
  • Health 68
Replace Doman Lum with:
Doman Lum United States
Elizabeth Weaver United Kingdom
Jane Reeves United Kingdom
Robert B. Schafer United States
Germán Lobos Chile
Anna Maria Meneghini Italy
Ronald W. Berkowsky United States
John Percival United Kingdom
Phil Lyon United Kingdom
Mike Titterton United Kingdom
Denise Tanner relative to Doman Lum United States Doman Lum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Doman Lum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Tanner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Tanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Tanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Tanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Tanner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Tanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Tanner. The network helps show where Denise Tanner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Tanner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise Tanner Line = papers co-authored together Denise Tanner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012122
2 2014105
3 201291
4 201446
5 200239
6 201337
7 200136
8 201535
9 200234
10
Understanding and improving transitions of older people: a user and carer centred approach
201230
11 201327
12 200327
13 200625
14 200724
15 201124
16 201921
17 201420
18 200616
19 201715
20 201814

About Denise Tanner

Denise Tanner is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Plant Science, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (17 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (13 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (12 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (11 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (9 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (61 citations), Public Administration (112 citations), General Health Professions (423 citations), Demography (108 citations) and Health (68 citations). Denise Tanner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rosemary Littlechild, Kelly Hall, A.C Cleland, Mo Ray, Umezuruike Linus Opara, Alisoun Milne, Mary Pat Sullivan, Liz Lloyd, Sally Richards and Judith Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Health & Social Care in the Community, International Journal of Refrigeration, Social Work Education and Ageing and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact