Denise Scholtens
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 1%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Co-authors
- William L. LoweBoyd E. MetzgerLynn P. LoweSeema A. KhanChristopher B. NewgardJames R. BainMichael J. MuehlbauerMichael Nodzenski
- Topics
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (41 papers)Birth, Development, and Health (39 papers)Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (21 papers)
- Journals
- JAMACirculationNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Denise Scholtens
125 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 808
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 716
- Cancer Research 598
- Oncology 510
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Scholtens
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Scholtens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Scholtens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Scholtens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Scholtens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Scholtens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Scholtens. The network helps show where Denise Scholtens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Scholtens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Scholtens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Scholtens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Scholtens. Denise Scholtens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 83 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Denise Scholtens
Denise Scholtens is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cancer Research, having authored 137 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (41 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (39 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (808 citations), Cancer Research (598 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (716 citations). Denise Scholtens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William L. Lowe, Boyd E. Metzger, Lynn P. Lowe, Seema A. Khan, Christopher B. Newgard, James R. Bain, Michael J. Muehlbauer, Michael Nodzenski, Anna C. Reisetter and M. Geoffrey Hayes. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Circulation and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.