Denis Voronin
- Infectious Diseases top 1%
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Topics
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (28 papers)Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (16 papers)Mosquito-borne diseases and control (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Denis Voronin
35 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Infectious Diseases 1.3k
- Insect Science 838
- Molecular Biology 442
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 361
- Ecology 194
Countries citing papers authored by Denis Voronin
This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Voronin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Voronin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Voronin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Voronin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Voronin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Voronin. The network helps show where Denis Voronin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Voronin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Voronin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Voronin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Voronin. Denis Voronin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | Characterization of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of 2019 novel coronavirus: implication for development of RBD protein as a viral attachment inhibitor and vaccinebreakdown → | 1179 |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 95 | |
| 19 | Genetic and functional characterization of the type IV secretion system in Wolbachia | 3 |
| 20 | 122 |
About Denis Voronin
Denis Voronin is a scholar working on Insect Science, Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (28 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (16 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (1.3k citations), Insect Science (838 citations) and Horticulture (25 citations). Denis Voronin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lanying Du, Wanbo Tai, Xiujuan Zhang, Shibo Jiang, Yusen Zhou, Jing Pu, Lei He, Patrick Mavingui, Mark J. Taylor and Van Tran-Van. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.