Amanda Lane
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
Papers in
-
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology 6
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 7
- Co-authors
- W. M. Lonsdale (3 shared papers)Richard Shine (7 shared papers)Scott L. O’Neill (4 shared papers)Elizabeth A. McGraw (4 shared papers)Conor J. McMeniman (2 shared papers)Iñaki Iturbe‐Ormaetxe (2 shared papers)Denis Voronin (1 shared paper)Ryuichi Yamada (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)Journal of Medical Entomology (2 papers)Current Zoology (1 paper)Molecular Ecology Resources (1 paper)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amanda Lane
24 papers receiving 719 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Insect Science 264
- Ecological Modeling 61
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 172
- Parasitology 83
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 166
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Lane
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Lane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Lane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Lane. The network helps show where Amanda Lane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 122 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 6 |
About Amanda Lane
Amanda Lane is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics and Insect Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (2 papers) and Viral Infections and Vectors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (264 citations), Ecological Modeling (61 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (172 citations), Parasitology (83 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (166 citations). Amanda Lane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include W. M. Lonsdale, Richard Shine, Scott L. O’Neill, Elizabeth A. McGraw, Conor J. McMeniman, Iñaki Iturbe‐Ormaetxe, Denis Voronin, Ryuichi Yamada, Manfred Lenzen and Asaph Widmer‐Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Medical Entomology, Current Zoology, Molecular Ecology Resources and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.