Denis Rutovitz
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Olli KallioniemiDamir SudarAnne KallioniemiDan PinkelFred WaldmanJoe W. GrayJim PiperJ. W. Gray
- Topics
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (10 papers)Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers)Gene expression and cancer classification (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
Denis Rutovitz
30 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Genetics 2.0k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Cancer Research 909
- Plant Science 716
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 552
Countries citing papers authored by Denis Rutovitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Rutovitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Rutovitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Rutovitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Rutovitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Rutovitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Rutovitz. The network helps show where Denis Rutovitz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Rutovitz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Rutovitz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Rutovitz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Rutovitz. Denis Rutovitz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 224 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | A collaborative trial of a semi-automatic system for slide preparation and screening in cervical cytopathology. | 5 |
| 6 | Automatic aberration scoring using whole chromosome F. I. S. H | 1 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | Comparison of ACLS and classical linear methods in a biological application | 5 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 51 | |
| 12 | An efficient multiple-cell approach to automatic aneuploidy screening. | 4 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 78 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | A cytogeneticist's microscope. | 9 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 75 |
About Denis Rutovitz
Denis Rutovitz is a scholar working on Biophysics, Genetics and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 32 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (10 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (2.0k citations), Cancer Research (909 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (552 citations). Denis Rutovitz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Olli Kallioniemi, Damir Sudar, Anne Kallioniemi, Dan Pinkel, Fred Waldman, Joe W. Gray, Jim Piper, J. W. Gray, Frederic M. Waldman and D. Pinkel. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Pattern Recognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.