Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables.
1968857 citationsJ. W. Gray, Robert C. Gunning et al.American Mathematical Monthlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Gray more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Gray. The network helps show where J. W. Gray may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. W. Gray
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. W. Gray.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. W. Gray based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. W. Gray. J. W. Gray is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Levin, Nikki, Pius Brzoska, Nisha Gupta, et al.. (1994). Identification of frequent novel genetic alterations in small cell lung carcinoma.. PubMed. 54(19). 5086–91.74 indexed citations
3.
Gray, J. W., et al.. (1992). A degenerate alpha satellite probe, detecting a centromeric deletion on chromosome 21 in an apparently normal human male, shows limitations of the use of satellite DNA probes for interphase ploidy analysis.. PubMed. 4(2). 81–6.32 indexed citations
Gray, J. W., et al.. (1990). Molecular cytogenetics using fluorescence in situ hybridization. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).4 indexed citations
Gray, J. W., et al.. (1983). Rapid cell cycle analysis. II. Phase durations and dispersions from computer analysis of RC curves.. PubMed. 16(5). 457–71.14 indexed citations
14.
Gray, J. W., J. N. Lucas, & Daniel Pinkel. (1981). Slit-scan flow cytometry: analysis of Chinese hamster M3-1 chromosomes. 89. 249–255.6 indexed citations
15.
Gray, J. W. & Philip Coffino. (1979). [19] Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 58. 233–248.102 indexed citations
16.
Merrill, J. T., Phillip N. Dean, & J. W. Gray. (1979). Investigations in high-precision sorting.. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 27(1). 280–283.7 indexed citations
17.
Pallavicini, Maria G., Amos Cohen, Lyle A. Dethlefsen, & J. W. Gray. (1977). Dispersal of solid tumors for flow cytometer (FCM) analysis. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).6 indexed citations
18.
Mendelsohn, M.L., et al.. (1976). Image analysis, flow fluorometry, and flow sorting of mammalian chromosomes. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).3 indexed citations
19.
Carrano, A.V., et al.. (1976). High speed chromosome measurement and sorting using flow systems.2 indexed citations
20.
Gray, J. W., Robert C. Gunning, & Hugo Rossi. (1968). Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables.. American Mathematical Monthly. 75(4). 429–429.857 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.