Frederic M. Waldman

800 total citations
11 papers, 624 citations indexed

About

Frederic M. Waldman is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederic M. Waldman has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 624 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Frederic M. Waldman's work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (8 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Frederic M. Waldman is often cited by papers focused on Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (8 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Frederic M. Waldman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Finland. Frederic M. Waldman's co-authors include Damir Sudar, Olli Kallioniemi, Jim Piper, Denis Rutovitz, J. W. Gray, Anne Kallioniemi, Dan Pinkel, Guido Sauter, Joe W. Gray and Michael J. Mihatsch and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, Human Pathology and Genes Chromosomes and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Frederic M. Waldman

11 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers

Frederic M. Waldman

GENET

MB

CR

PFM

ONCOL

Daniël Olde Weghuis Netherlands

Madelyn Feder United States

Anke Schwendel Germany

Asta Varis Finland

Holger Kohlhammer Germany

Kaushalya Amarasinghe Australia

Pinchas Osin United Kingdom

John F. Herath United States

Barbro Werelius Sweden

Emmanuel Tubacher France

Daniël Olde Weghuis Netherlands

Frederic M. Waldman

238 ×0.8

GENET

412 ×1.5

MB

174 ×0.8

CR

102 ×0.6

PFM

91 ×0.6

ONCOL

Citations per year, relative to Frederic M. Waldman Frederic M. Waldman (= 1×) peers Daniël Olde Weghuis

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic M. Waldman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic M. Waldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic M. Waldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic M. Waldman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic M. Waldman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic M. Waldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic M. Waldman. The network helps show where Frederic M. Waldman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederic M. Waldman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederic M. Waldman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederic M. Waldman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederic M. Waldman. Frederic M. Waldman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Waldman, Frederic M., E. Shelley Hwang, Joan Etzell, et al.. (2001). Genomic alterations in tubular breast carcinomas. Human Pathology. 32(2). 222–226. 37 indexed citations

2.

Metzger, Andrew, Gayatry Mohapatra, Yuriko Minn, et al.. (1999). Multiple genetic aberrations including evidence of chromosome 11q13 rearrangement detected in pituitary adenomas by comparative genomic hybridization. Journal of neurosurgery. 90(2). 306–314. 29 indexed citations

3.

Korn, W. Michael, et al.. (1999). Chromosome arm 20q gains and other genomic alterations in colorectal cancer metastatic to liver, as analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 25(2). 82–90. 114 indexed citations

4.

Sauter, Guido, et al.. (1997). Epidermal growth factor receptor expression is associated with rapid tumor cell proliferation in renal cell carcinoma. Human Pathology. 28(11). 1255–1259. 73 indexed citations

5.

Ghazvini, Siavash, et al.. (1996). Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded uveal melanomas. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 90(2). 95–101. 45 indexed citations

6.

Waldman, Frederic M., Guido Sauter, Damir Sudar, & Curtis Thompson. (1996). Molecular cytometry of cancer. Human Pathology. 27(5). 441–449. 8 indexed citations

7.

Moore, Dan H., et al.. (1996). Interlaboratory variability in fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Cytometry. 25(2). 125–132. 14 indexed citations

8.

Piper, Jim, Denis Rutovitz, Damir Sudar, et al.. (1995). Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry. 19(1). 10–26. 224 indexed citations

9.

Balázs, Margit, et al.. (1995). Karyotypic heterogeneity and its relation to labeling index in interphase breast tumor cells. Cytometry. 20(1). 62–73. 20 indexed citations

10.

Sauter, Guido, Holger Moch, Urs Wagner, et al.. (1995). Y chromosome loss detected by FISH in bladder cancer. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 82(2). 163–169. 52 indexed citations

11.

DeVries, Sandy, et al.. (1995). Reutilization of previously hybridized slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytometry. 21(4). 378–381. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact