Jim Piper

3.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
47 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Jim Piper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jim Piper has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Molecular Biology, 21 papers in Genetics and 11 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Jim Piper's work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (16 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (15 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers). Jim Piper is often cited by papers focused on Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (16 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (15 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers). Jim Piper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Jim Piper's co-authors include Olli Kallioniemi, Anne Kallioniemi, Joe W. Gray, Dan Pinkel, Erik Granum, Jorma Isola, Fred Waldman, Denis Rutovitz, Minna Tanner and Helene S. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Jim Piper

43 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis... 1994 2026 2004 2015 1994 1994 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jim Piper United Kingdom 19 1.4k 1.2k 631 522 430 47 2.9k
Denis Rutovitz United Kingdom 12 2.0k 1.5× 1.5k 1.2× 909 1.4× 716 1.4× 552 1.3× 32 3.3k
Damir Sudar United States 16 3.2k 2.3× 2.7k 2.2× 1.3k 2.1× 1.1k 2.2× 711 1.7× 37 5.2k
E. S. Venkatraman United States 21 1.4k 1.0× 1.7k 1.3× 922 1.5× 275 0.5× 293 0.7× 41 4.1k
Moritz Gerstung United Kingdom 29 874 0.6× 3.4k 2.8× 2.2k 3.5× 457 0.9× 565 1.3× 55 5.8k
Laurakay Bruhn United States 15 735 0.5× 5.4k 4.4× 361 0.6× 107 0.2× 239 0.6× 19 6.1k
Richard Segraves United States 20 3.5k 2.5× 3.3k 2.7× 1.1k 1.7× 1.8k 3.4× 630 1.5× 30 5.7k
Long P. Le United States 37 1.1k 0.8× 3.4k 2.8× 1.0k 1.6× 193 0.4× 633 1.5× 94 6.6k
Karsten Schlüns Germany 29 376 0.3× 1.1k 0.9× 710 1.1× 60 0.1× 300 0.7× 59 2.7k
Christopher T. Saunders United States 10 940 0.7× 1.8k 1.4× 1.1k 1.8× 215 0.4× 420 1.0× 22 3.2k
Sascha Dietrich Germany 32 584 0.4× 2.0k 1.6× 401 0.6× 94 0.2× 784 1.8× 158 4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Piper. The network helps show where Jim Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jim Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jim Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jim Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jim Piper. Jim Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Piper, Jim, Yoshihiro Ikeda, Yasuko Fujisawa, et al.. (2012). Objective evaluation of the correction by non-rigid registration of abdominal organ motion in low-dose 4D dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 57(6). 1701–1715. 16 indexed citations
2.
Graham, Jim & Jim Piper. (2003). Automatic Karyotype Analysis. Humana Press eBooks. 29. 141–186. 38 indexed citations
3.
Piper, Jim. (2003). Interval skeletons. 468–471.
5.
King, W., John H. Proffitt, Larry E. Morrison, et al.. (2000). The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization technologies in molecular diagnostics and disease management.. PubMed. 5(4). 309–19. 18 indexed citations
6.
Piper, Jim, Denis Rutovitz, Damir Sudar, et al.. (1995). Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry. 19(1). 10–26. 224 indexed citations
7.
Manoir, Stanislas du, Olli Kallioniemi, Jim Piper, et al.. (1995). Hardware and software requirements for quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry. 19(1). 4–9. 62 indexed citations
8.
Silva, Maria João, et al.. (1994). Dose dependence of radiation-induced micronuclei in cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology. 322(2). 117–128. 28 indexed citations
9.
Kallioniemi, Olli, Anne Kallioniemi, Jim Piper, et al.. (1994). Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 10(4). 231–243. 894 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Piper, Jim, et al.. (1994). Automatic scoring of sister chromatid exchanges by image analysis in a dose response experiment. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 23(3). 194–199. 4 indexed citations
11.
Li, Linheng, Patrick C. Malloy, Jim Piper, et al.. (1993). Biological dosimetry. Cytometry. 14(S6). 55–55. 2 indexed citations
12.
Winn, Richard E., J. Anderson, Jim Piper, Naomi Aronson, & Jerry L. Pluss. (1993). Systemic Sporotrichosis Treated with Itraconazole. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 17(2). 210–217. 37 indexed citations
13.
Carothers, A D, Xiaowei Chen, Liang Ji, et al.. (1991). Radiation dosimetry by automatic image analysis of dicentric chromosomes. Mutation Research/Environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects. 253(3). 223–235. 30 indexed citations
14.
Piper, Jim, et al.. (1990). Automatic detection of fragile X chromosomes using an X centromere probe. Cytometry. 11(1). 73–79. 6 indexed citations
15.
Piper, Jim & Erik Granum. (1989). On fully automatic feature measurement for banded chromosome classification. Cytometry. 10(3). 242–255. 152 indexed citations
16.
Fantes, Judith A., John R. Gosden, & Jim Piper. (1988). Use of an alphoid satellite sequence to locate the X chromosome automatically, with particular reference to identification of the fragile X. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 48(3). 142–147. 13 indexed citations
17.
Piper, Jim & Erik Granum. (1987). Computing distance transformations in convex and non-convex domains. Pattern Recognition. 20(6). 599–615. 81 indexed citations
18.
Piper, Jim. (1987). The effect of zero feature correlation assumption on maximum likelihood based classification of chromosomes. Signal Processing. 12(1). 49–57. 28 indexed citations
19.
Piper, Jim. (1985). Efficient implementation of skeletonisation using interval coding. Pattern Recognition Letters. 3(6). 389–397. 27 indexed citations
20.
Piper, Jim & John Elder. (1984). Image Enhancement In Biological Microscopy. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 467. 178–178. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026