Debra L. Ness

508 citations
13 papers · 281 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Debra L. Ness

13 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Debra L. Ness
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Health Professions 166
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 22
  • Family Practice 7
  • Health Information Management 13
  • Rehabilitation 16
Replace Fiona Marshall with:
Fiona Marshall United Kingdom
Susan Williams United Kingdom
Stacey Daub Canada
Sarah HM Robben Netherlands
Melanie Jessup Australia
Marlène Karam Canada
Sanne Jannick Kuipers Netherlands
Anita Karaca Türkiye
Marjorie Nealon Seibert United States
Jane A. Walker United States
Debra L. Ness relative to Fiona Marshall United Kingdom Fiona Marshall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Fiona Marshall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra L. Ness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra L. Ness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra L. Ness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra L. Ness more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra L. Ness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra L. Ness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra L. Ness. The network helps show where Debra L. Ness may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra L. Ness, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra L. Ness Line = papers co-authored together Debra L. Ness links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 202027
2 202017
3 20194
4 20175
5 201635
6 20162
7 201523
8 201423
9 20146
10
The imperative to promote collaborative consumer engagement: lessons from the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.
20122
11
Women, Caregivers, Families, and the Affordable Care Act's Bright Promise of Better Care
20111
12 2010112
13 200824

About Debra L. Ness

Debra L. Ness is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (166 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (22 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Health Information Management (13 citations) and Rehabilitation (16 citations). Debra L. Ness has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christine Bechtel, B. Johnson, Steven E. Weinberger, Aaron Rindflesch, Dhruv Khullar, Jennifer Sweeney, Tracy M. Mroz, Robert J. Reid, Marlaine Figueroa Gray and Hal C. Lawrence. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Health Affairs, JAMA, Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026