Deborah G. Sauder

466 total citations
24 papers, 405 citations indexed

About

Deborah G. Sauder is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah G. Sauder has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 405 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Spectroscopy, 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 6 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Deborah G. Sauder's work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (9 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers) and Various Chemistry Research Topics (6 papers). Deborah G. Sauder is often cited by papers focused on Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (9 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers) and Various Chemistry Research Topics (6 papers). Deborah G. Sauder collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deborah G. Sauder's co-authors include Paul J. Dagdigian, David S. King, Michael P. Casassa, John C. Stephenson, Marcy H. Towns, Gérard Parlant, David R. Yarkony, Theresa Julia Zielinski, George R. Long and Gregory T. Rushton and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Deborah G. Sauder

24 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah G. Sauder United States 12 257 187 169 48 44 24 405
Jodye I. Selco United States 12 205 0.8× 153 0.8× 64 0.4× 37 0.8× 59 1.3× 23 432
Margaret Bruehl United States 10 214 0.8× 113 0.6× 39 0.2× 16 0.3× 74 1.7× 10 364
P. M. Sheridan United States 13 323 1.3× 206 1.1× 57 0.3× 75 1.6× 9 0.2× 36 430
Glênisson de Oliveira United States 11 396 1.5× 229 1.2× 106 0.6× 57 1.2× 8 0.2× 15 545
Nathanael M. Kidwell United States 12 249 1.0× 203 1.1× 184 1.1× 48 1.0× 5 0.1× 25 421
L. Wood United States 9 127 0.5× 67 0.4× 38 0.2× 53 1.1× 41 0.9× 20 338
Bert E. Holmes United States 17 530 2.1× 165 0.9× 371 2.2× 35 0.7× 4 0.1× 56 652
Federico Lazzari Italy 13 227 0.9× 193 1.0× 43 0.3× 46 1.0× 5 0.1× 30 365
David L. Schutt United States 9 493 1.9× 111 0.6× 38 0.2× 36 0.8× 19 0.4× 12 664
J. F. Julius Schmidt Germany 7 95 0.4× 134 0.7× 13 0.1× 68 1.4× 6 0.1× 18 263

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah G. Sauder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah G. Sauder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah G. Sauder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah G. Sauder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah G. Sauder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah G. Sauder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah G. Sauder. The network helps show where Deborah G. Sauder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah G. Sauder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah G. Sauder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah G. Sauder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah G. Sauder. Deborah G. Sauder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ristvey, Andrew G., et al.. (2022). Extraction of Antioxidants fromAronia mitschuriniiJuice Using Macroporous Resins. ACS Omega. 7(34). 29877–29885. 8 indexed citations
2.
Criswell, Brett, et al.. (2014). Pushing for particulate level models of adiabatic and isothermal processes in upper-level chemistry courses: a qualitative study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 15(3). 354–365. 15 indexed citations
3.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (2013). Using Etching, Electroplating and Lithography as a Laboratory Sequence in Chemistry of Art and Nanotechnology Themed Physical Science Courses. 1(3). 49–53. 2 indexed citations
4.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (2010). Adapting to Student Learning Styles: Using Cell Phone Technology in Undergraduate Science Instruction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
5.
6.
Towns, Marcy H., Deborah G. Sauder, George R. Long, et al.. (2001). Interinstitutional Peer Review on the Internet: Crossing Boundaries Electronically in a Student-Refereed Assignment.. The journal of college science teaching. 30(4). 9 indexed citations
7.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (2001). Physical Chemistry On Line: Interinstitutional Collaboration at a Distance. Journal of Chemical Education. 78(3). 414–414. 6 indexed citations
8.
Sauder, Deborah G., Marcy H. Towns, Alexander Grushow, et al.. (2000). Physical Chemistry Online. The Chemical Educator. 5(2). 77–82. 4 indexed citations
9.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (1999). The Iodine Spectrum: A New Look at an Old Topic. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(6). 841–841. 4 indexed citations
10.
Towns, Marcy H., et al.. (1998). An Assessment of a Physical Chemistry Online Activity. Journal of Chemical Education. 75(12). 1653–1653. 6 indexed citations
11.
Towns, Marcy H., et al.. (1997). Online Cooperative Learning in Physical Chemistry. The Chemical Educator. 2(1). 1–21. 12 indexed citations
12.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (1997). Physical Chemistry Students Explore Nonlinear Curve Fitting On-Line: An Experiment in Developing An Intercollegiate Learning Community. Journal of Chemical Education. 74(3). 269–269. 3 indexed citations
13.
King, David S., Deborah G. Sauder, & Michael P. Casassa. (1994). Cluster effects in O3/H2O photochemistry: Dynamics of the O+H2O→2OH reaction photoinitiated in the O3⋅H2O dimer. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 100(6). 4200–4210. 23 indexed citations
14.
Casassa, Michael P., Deborah G. Sauder, & David S. King. (1993). <title>Product state correlations in the reaction of O(1D) and H2O in bimolecular collisions and in O3H2O clusters</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1858. 256–262. 5 indexed citations
15.
Sauder, Deborah G., John C. Stephenson, David S. King, & Michael P. Casassa. (1992). Nascent product states in the photoinitiated reaction of O3 and H2O. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 97(2). 952–961. 55 indexed citations
16.
King, David S., Deborah G. Sauder, & Michael P. Casassa. (1992). Product kinetic energies, correlations, and scattering anisotropy in the bimolecular reaction O(1D)+H2O→2OH. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 97(8). 5919–5922. 29 indexed citations
17.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (1991). Internal state distribution of OD produced from the O(3P)+ND2 reaction. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 95(2). 955–962. 24 indexed citations
18.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (1991). The vibronic state distribution of the NCO(X 2Π) product from the CN+O2 reaction. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 95(3). 1696–1707. 40 indexed citations
19.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (1991). Comment on: Observation of highly excited bending levels in NCO(X 2 Π). The Journal of Chemical Physics. 95(3). 2222–2222. 8 indexed citations
20.
Sauder, Deborah G., et al.. (1989). Rotationally inelastic collisions of a molecule in a 1Δ electronic state: NH(a 1Δ). The Journal of Chemical Physics. 91(9). 5316–5323. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026