Deborah C. Good

11 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Deborah C. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Gender Studies 64
  • Pharmacy 16
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 34
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 18
Replace Nathan Joseph with:
Nathan Joseph United States
Francesca Manzi United States
Lara Descartes United States
Alexandra Dundas Todd United States
Sarah Jackson United States
Steven Swann Jones United States
Heidi M. Hurd United States
Marjorie M. Shultz United States
Charlotte Furth United States
Mary G. Winkler United States
Deborah C. Good relative to Nathan Joseph United States Nathan Joseph's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Nathan Joseph · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah C. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah C. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah C. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah C. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah C. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah C. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah C. Good. The network helps show where Deborah C. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah C. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah C. Good Line = papers co-authored together Deborah C. Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1990110
2 198734
3 201917
4 202311
5 20257
6 20236
7 20246
8 20215
9 20234
10 20234
11
It's More Than Just a Simulation: Deepening and Broadening Student Learning Using a Business Enterprise Simulation as a Platform
20173
12 20230
13 20210

About Deborah C. Good

Deborah C. Good is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (7 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (4 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (1 paper), Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper) and Management and Marketing Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (64 citations), Pharmacy (16 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (34 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (18 citations). Deborah C. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Josephine E. Olson, Irene Hanson Frieze, Nisha Nair, Audrey J. Murrell, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, I. H. Stairs, Emmanuel Fonseca, Ken Van Tilburg, Bradley W. Meyers and James W. McKee. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact