Paul Scholz
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- V. M. KaspiR. F. ArchibaldShriharsh P. TendulkarC.‐Y. NgJ. W. T. HesselsAndrew SeymourL. G. SpitlerRyan S. Lynch
- Topics
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (22 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Paul Scholz
36 papers receiving 721 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 609
- Geophysics 137
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 100
- Biomedical Engineering 70
- Molecular Biology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Scholz
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Scholz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Scholz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Scholz. The network helps show where Paul Scholz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Scholz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Scholz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Scholz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Scholz. Paul Scholz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | A bright millisecond-timescale radio burst from the direction of the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 | 1 |
| 13 | 59 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Swift XRT Observations of SGR J0755-2933 | 1 |
| 16 | 82 | |
| 17 | Swift/XRT Observations of Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 4U 0142+61 Following a Burst | 1 |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Paul Scholz
Paul Scholz is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Management Information Systems, having authored 39 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (22 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (609 citations), Geophysics (137 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (100 citations). Paul Scholz has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include V. M. Kaspi, R. F. Archibald, Shriharsh P. Tendulkar, C.‐Y. Ng, J. W. T. Hessels, Andrew Seymour, L. G. Spitler, Ryan S. Lynch, M. Krämer and G H Hilmarsson. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, ACS Nano and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.