S. Geier

1.8k total citations
23 papers, 239 citations indexed

About

S. Geier is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Geier has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 239 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in S. Geier's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (14 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers). S. Geier is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (14 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers). S. Geier collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Denmark and Germany. S. Geier's co-authors include J. P. U. Fynbo, Jens-Kristian Krogager, P. Møller, L. Christensen, C. Ledoux, T. Krühler, P. Noterdaeme, D. Watson, Tayyaba Zafar and Justyn R. Maund and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Scientific Reports and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

S. Geier

19 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Geier Spain 9 228 65 34 7 7 23 239
R. Charlassier France 3 91 0.4× 21 0.3× 19 0.6× 3 0.4× 4 0.6× 6 94
Matthew L. Stevans United States 8 185 0.8× 99 1.5× 27 0.8× 1 0.1× 6 0.9× 10 187
Robin Kooistra Netherlands 7 99 0.4× 26 0.4× 47 1.4× 6 0.9× 8 103
Luwenjia Zhou China 7 196 0.9× 81 1.2× 20 0.6× 4 0.6× 12 203
A. J. T. Ramaila South Africa 5 126 0.6× 22 0.3× 74 2.2× 3 0.4× 2 0.3× 9 137
R. Nordon Israel 6 197 0.9× 70 1.1× 26 0.8× 2 0.3× 7 198
Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols France 7 124 0.5× 40 0.6× 37 1.1× 2 0.3× 15 126
Carlos J. Vargas United States 8 136 0.6× 34 0.5× 46 1.4× 2 0.3× 19 147
Alec S. Hirschauer United States 9 207 0.9× 82 1.3× 21 0.6× 2 0.3× 31 220
Z. L. Zou China 5 134 0.6× 63 1.0× 14 0.4× 1 0.1× 8 1.1× 16 138

Countries citing papers authored by S. Geier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Geier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Geier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Geier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Geier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Geier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Geier. The network helps show where S. Geier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Geier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Geier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Geier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Geier. S. Geier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Zhongxiang, et al.. (2025). AT2022sxl: A Candidate Repeating Tidal Disruption Event in Possible Association with Two High-energy Neutrino Events. The Astrophysical Journal. 991(1). 20–20.
2.
Fynbo, J. P. U., K. E. Heintz, Jens-Kristian Krogager, et al.. (2024). Absence of radio-bright dominance in a near-infrared selected sample of red quasars. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 683. A157–A157. 1 indexed citations
3.
Solano, E., et al.. (2023). A bright triple transient that vanished within 50 min. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(3). 6312–6320. 3 indexed citations
4.
Kirichenko, A. Yu., S. V. Zharikov, Emmanuel Fonseca, et al.. (2023). The black widow pulsar J1641+8049 in the optical, radio, and X-rays. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(3). 4563–4572. 4 indexed citations
5.
Fynbo, J. P. U., L. Christensen, S. Geier, et al.. (2023). The galaxy counterpart and environment of the dusty damped Lyman-αabsorber atz= 2.226 towards Q 1218+0832. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 679. A30–A30. 2 indexed citations
6.
Geier, S., et al.. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment for Photovoltaic Structures—Comparative Study of Rooftop and Free-Field PV Applications. Sustainability. 15(18). 13692–13692. 7 indexed citations
7.
Poidevin, F., Conor M. B. Omand, I. Pérez‐Fournon, et al.. (2022). Post maximum light and late time optical imaging polarimetry of type I superluminous supernova 2020znr. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 511(4). 5948–5963. 8 indexed citations
8.
Zyuzin, D. A., S. V. Zharikov, A. Yu. Kirichenko, et al.. (2022). Likely optical counterpart of the cool middle-aged pulsar J1957+5033. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 513(4). 6088–6094. 2 indexed citations
9.
Marcy, Geoffrey W., S. Geier, A. Streblyanska, et al.. (2021). Exploring nine simultaneously occurring transients on April 12th 1950. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 8 indexed citations
10.
Brennan, S., T. Pursimo, J. P. U. Fynbo, et al.. (2020). Serendipitous Discovery of a Physical Binary Quasar at z = 1.76. The Astronomical Journal. 159(3). 122–122. 1 indexed citations
11.
Fynbo, J. P. U., P. Møller, K. E. Heintz, et al.. (2019). Gaia-assisted discovery of a detached low-ionisation BAL quasar with very large ejection velocities. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 634. A111–A111. 2 indexed citations
12.
Marques-Chaves, R., I. Pérez‐Fournon, Y. Shu, et al.. (2019). Rest-frame UV properties of luminous strong gravitationally lensed Lyα emitters from the BELLS GALLERY Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 492(1). 1257–1278. 16 indexed citations
13.
Brennan, S., et al.. (2019). Discovery of a binary quasar at z = 1.76. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 49(3). 528–531.
14.
Heintz, K. E., J. P. U. Fynbo, C. Ledoux, et al.. (2018). A quasar hiding behind two dusty absorbers. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 615. A43–A43. 14 indexed citations
15.
Heintz, K. E., J. P. U. Fynbo, E. Høg, et al.. (2018). Unidentified quasars among stationary objects from Gaia DR2. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 615. L8–L8. 9 indexed citations
16.
Fynbo, J. P. U., Jens-Kristian Krogager, K. E. Heintz, et al.. (2017). The HighAVQuasar Survey: Az = 2.027 metal-rich damped Lyman-αabsorber towards a red quasar atz = 3.21. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 606. A13–A13. 12 indexed citations
17.
Heintz, K. E., J. P. U. Fynbo, P. Møller, et al.. (2016). Determining the fraction of reddened quasars in COSMOS with multiple selection techniques from X-ray to radio wavelengths. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 7 indexed citations
18.
Zafar, Tayyaba, P. Møller, D. Watson, et al.. (2015). Extinction curve template for intrinsically reddened quasars. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 35 indexed citations
19.
Geier, S., Johan Richard, Allison W. S. Man, et al.. (2013). VLT/X-SHOOTER NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY ANDHSTIMAGING OF GRAVITATIONALLY LENSEDz∼ 2 COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES. The Astrophysical Journal. 777(2). 87–87. 9 indexed citations
20.
Krühler, T., J. P. U. Fynbo, S. Geier, et al.. (2012). The metal-enriched host of an energeticγ-ray burst atz ≈  1.6. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 546. A8–A8. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026