Deborah Brown

728 citations
54 papers · 296 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Brown

44 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Deborah Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • Philosophy 53
  • Economics and Econometrics 75
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20
  • Aging 4
Replace David Todd with:
David Todd Canada
Barbara Forrest United States
Leo Zaibert United States
Alexander Broadie United Kingdom
Roger Fellows United Kingdom
Richard Doyle United States
Rick Rylance United Kingdom
W. A. Suchting Australia
Marion Godman United Kingdom
Michael S. Pardo United States
Deborah Brown relative to David Todd Canada David Todd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
David Todd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Brown. The network helps show where Deborah Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Brown Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198538
2 200636
3 201819
4 198719
5 198515
6 198415
7 200314
8
Promoting Reflective Thinking: Preservice Teachers' Literacy Autobiographies as a Common Text.
199910
9 20219
10 20199
11 19879
12 20118
13 20218
14 20117
15 20226
16 20215
17
Listening to the experiences of the long-term displaced
20094
18 20194
19 19864
20 20164

About Deborah Brown

Deborah Brown is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics, Philosophy and Education, having authored 54 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (10 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers) and Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations), Philosophy (53 citations), Economics and Econometrics (75 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (20 citations) and Aging (4 citations). Deborah Brown has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brian Key, David M. Goldberg, Keith C. Brown, Stephen B. Lovejoy, Calvin G. Normore, Oressia Zalucki, John Lee, Bruce Behringer, Katherine Mansfield and Patricia Smith. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, The Monist, Canadian Journal of Philosophy and Thinking Skills and Creativity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact