David Todd

1.0k citations
33 papers · 287 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

David Todd

29 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

David Todd
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • History and Philosophy of Science 80
  • Philosophy 61
  • History 50
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
  • Anthropology 24
Replace Alexander Broadie with:
Alexander Broadie United Kingdom
George Lewis Levine United States
E. S. de Beer United States
Horst Bredekamp Germany
Leslie Stephen United States
Cynthia Freeland United States
Hans Aarsleff United States
Svetlana Alpers United States
Benedetto Croce
Giambattista Vico
David Todd relative to Alexander Broadie United Kingdom Alexander Broadie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Alexander Broadie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Todd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Todd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Todd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Todd. The network helps show where David Todd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside David Todd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Todd Line = papers co-authored together David Todd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972106
2 201134
3
Bullshit and Philosophy
200823
4 200815
5 197415
6 201411
7 20188
8 19777
9 19797
10 19817
11 20156
12
L'identité économique de la France : Libre-échange et protectionnisme 1814-1851
20085
13 19774
14 19794
15 20004
16 19844
17 19774
18 20163
19 19833
20
Le protectionnisme, un libéralisme internationaliste: Naissance et diffusion, 1789-1914
20092

About David Todd

David Todd is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 33 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (7 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), Rural development and sustainability (4 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers), Economic Zones and Regional Development (2 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (2 papers), Global trade and economics (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (80 citations), Philosophy (61 citations), History (50 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations) and Anthropology (24 citations). David Todd has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Miles Pickering. Their work appears in journals such as Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Regional Studies, Past & Present, Law and History Review and Modern Intellectual History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact