David Wright

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
27 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

David Wright is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Wright has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Education, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in David Wright's work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers). David Wright is often cited by papers focused on Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers). David Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. David Wright's co-authors include Ming Tien, John A. Bumpus, Steven D. Aust, Younghee Sheen, Sandra L. Titus, Πέτρος Δελλαπόρτας, T. J. Kasperbauer, William P. Kuvlesky, Arthur J. Bonito and S. H. Irvine and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Vocational Behavior and System.

In The Last Decade

David Wright

26 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Oxidation of Persistent Environmental Pollutants by a White Rot Fungus

1985 708 citations John A. Bumpus, Ming Tien et al. Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David Wright United States	9	502	375	198	188	178	27	1.2k
Phuong‐Mai Nguyen France	11	203 0.4×	33 0.1×	79 0.4×	25 0.1×	11 0.1×	24	969
María del Carmen Ricoy Lorenzo Spain	12	204 0.4×	31 0.1×	5 0.0×	23 0.1×	141 0.8×	75	641
Nikola Ljubešić Croatia	22	291 0.6×	50 0.1×	209 1.1×	38 0.2×	6 0.0×	225	2.2k
He Li China	16	209 0.4×	41 0.1×	7 0.0×	14 0.1×	91 0.5×	52	700
Abdul Karim Indonesia	20	206 0.4×	14 0.0×	157 0.8×	5 0.0×	18 0.1×	169	1.3k
Anders Norberg Sweden	12	30 0.1×	85 0.2×	11 0.1×	64 0.3×	11 0.1×	22	1.4k
Thomas A. Lewis United States	16	94 0.2×	310 0.8×	2 0.0×	158 0.8×	10 0.1×	32	931
Alejandro Hernández‐Morales Mexico	14	282 0.6×	39 0.1×	11 0.1×	15 0.1×	11 0.1×	57	682
Yan Zhu China	21	37 0.1×	32 0.1×	264 1.3×	28 0.1×	1 0.0×	94	1.5k
Bo-Kyeong Kim South Korea	14	461 0.9×	6 0.0×	6 0.0×	48 0.3×	14 0.1×	136	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by David Wright

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wright

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wright. The network helps show where David Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Wright. David Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Kasperbauer, T. J. & David Wright. (2019). Expanded FDA regulation of health and wellness apps. Bioethics. 34(3). 235–241. 19 indexed citations

2.

Wright, David, et al.. (2019). Critical thinking and its impact on therapeutic treatment outcomes: a critical examination. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 49(1). 1–14. 1 indexed citations

3.

Coulthard, Malcolm, et al.. (2016). Critical, theoretical, and methodological approaches to language in legal settings. 25–46. 1 indexed citations

4.

Wright, David. (2015). Are We Asking the Right Questions about Critical Thinking Assessment?. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 30(3). 20–31. 1 indexed citations

5.

Irvine, S. H., et al.. (2014). Quality of Life, Measurement of. PubMed. 48(5). 549–53. 12 indexed citations

6.

Wright, David, et al.. (2014). Eﬀects of surveillance on civil liberties and fundamental rights in Europe. 273–332. 1 indexed citations

7.

Wright, David, et al.. (2013). The Emergence of the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) in PHS Policy and Practice. Accountability in Research. 20(5-6). 349–368. 3 indexed citations

8.

Bonito, Arthur J., Sandra L. Titus, Angela Greene, et al.. (2012). Preparing Whistleblowers for Reporting Research Misconduct. Accountability in Research. 19(5). 308–328. 8 indexed citations

9.

Bonito, Arthur J., Sandra L. Titus, & David Wright. (2011). Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases. Science and Engineering Ethics. 18(4). 605–619. 12 indexed citations

10.

Wright, David, et al.. (2008). Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed ORI Cases. Science and Engineering Ethics. 14(3). 323–336. 66 indexed citations

11.

Wright, David. (2008). Do Words Have Inherent Meaning. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics. 65(2). 177. 1 indexed citations

12.

Wright, David. (2007). Casting the net over bullies. SecEd. 2007(11). 1 indexed citations

13.

Wright, David, et al.. (2005). An automated data collection system for the study of software reliability. 19. 571–576. 1 indexed citations

14.

Wright, David, et al.. (1998). The Politics of Second Generation Discrimination in American Indian Education. Praeger eBooks. 4 indexed citations

15.

Wright, David, et al.. (1995). Brains for the bucks? School revenue and student achievement in Oklahoma. The Social Science Journal. 32(3). 299–308. 6 indexed citations

16.

Δελλαπόρτας, Πέτρος & David Wright. (1991). Numerical Prediction for the Two-Parameter Weibull Distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician). 40(4). 365–365. 33 indexed citations

17.

Bumpus, John A., Ming Tien, David Wright, & Steven D. Aust. (1985). Oxidation of Persistent Environmental Pollutants by a White Rot Fungus. Science. 228(4706). 1434–1436. 708 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Wright, David & William P. Kuvlesky. (1968). Occupational Status Projections of Mexican American Youth Residing in the Rio Grande Valley.. 1 indexed citations

19.

Wright, David. (1968). Occupational orientations of Mexican American youth in selected Texas counties. OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries). 1 indexed citations

20.

Wright, David, et al.. (1966). Poverty Among Spanish Americans in Texas: Low-Income Families in a Minority Group.. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact