David W. Wright

91 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

David W. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Accounting 191
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 256
  • Virology 75
  • Inorganic Chemistry 182
  • Molecular Biology 780
Replace Markus Christen with:
Markus Christen Switzerland
Wolfgang Weber Germany
David Cyranoski Denmark
John Evans United States
Gordon Anderson United States
Atsushi Inoue Japan
Keith Roberts United Kingdom
David K. Lewis United States
Richard Van Noorden United States
Heidi Ledford United States
David W. Wright relative to Markus Christen Switzerland Markus Christen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Markus Christen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David W. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Wright. The network helps show where David W. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David W. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David W. Wright Line = papers co-authored together David W. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984188
2 1993147
3 2016110
4 2014109
5 2010104
6 1995103
7 199397
8 201597
9 199879
10 201079
11 198575
12 201660
13 200558
14 199552
15 201752
16 200850
17 199044
18 200735
19 201335
20 199633

About David W. Wright

David W. Wright is a scholar working on Virology, Structural Biology, Statistics and Probability, Infectious Diseases and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (18 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (10 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (9 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (8 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (5 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (5 papers), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (5 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (191 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (256 citations), Virology (75 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (182 citations) and Molecular Biology (780 citations). David W. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter V. Coveney, Shunzhou Wan, Richard B. Miller, Eugene A. Imhoff, Robert C. Lipe, William H. Armstrong, S. Kashif Sadiq, Christopher E. Dubé, Michael A. Galler and Lawrence Kryzanowski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of the American Chemical Society, North American Journal of Fisheries Management and Biochemical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026