Philip J. Potts
- Geophysics top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 0.5%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 0.5%
- Radiation top 0.5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Peter WebbMalcolm S. CresserJohn WatsonJean S. KaneOlwen Williams‐ThorpeJulian A. PearceR. S. ThorpeD. H. M. Alderton
- Topics
- Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (62 papers)X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (42 papers)Geological and Geochemical Analysis (33 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Potts
133 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Geophysics 2.2k
- Artificial Intelligence 1.7k
- Geochemistry and Petrology 847
- Radiation 780
- Analytical Chemistry 618
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Potts
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Potts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Potts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Potts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Potts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Potts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Potts. The network helps show where Philip J. Potts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip J. Potts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip J. Potts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip J. Potts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip J. Potts. Philip J. Potts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | The development of geoanalytical techniques: a historical perspective | 2 |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | Geochemical reference material compositions: rocks, minerals, sediments, soils, carbonates, refractories & ores used in research & industry | 29 |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 392 | |
| 17 | Chromite, platinoids, gold and moly in the Shetlands | 3 |
| 18 | On the precision of electron microprobe data; a new test for the homogeneity of mineral standards | 32 |
| 19 | Some observations on the chromite in the Shetland Ophiolite complex | 6 |
| 20 | 14 |
About Philip J. Potts
Philip J. Potts is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Geophysics, having authored 136 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (62 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (42 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (2.2k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (847 citations) and Radiation (780 citations). Philip J. Potts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter Webb, Malcolm S. Cresser, John Watson, Jean S. Kane, Olwen Williams‐Thorpe, Julian A. Pearce, R. S. Thorpe, D. H. M. Alderton, Andrew T. Ellis and P. Wobrauschek. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Earth and Planetary Science Letters and Inorganic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.