Peter J. Bonitatibus

3.4k citations
49 papers · 2.8k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 26

Peter J. Bonitatibus

46 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

A Recyclable Ru-Based Metathesis Catalyst19992026200820171999250500750

Peers

Peter J. Bonitatibus
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Organic Chemistry 1.9k
  • Molecular Biology 768
  • Inorganic Chemistry 589
  • Biomedical Engineering 509
  • Materials Chemistry 341
Replace Tzu‐Pin Lin with:
Tzu‐Pin Lin United States
Tae‐Jeong Kim South Korea
Jered C. Garrison United States
Xue‐Qiang Wang China
José Ruiz Spain
Daniel J. Parks United States
O. Schuster Germany
Andrea Correa Italy
Markus Drees Germany
Kristina Djanashvili Netherlands
Peter J. Bonitatibus relative to Tzu‐Pin Lin United States Tzu‐Pin Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Tzu‐Pin Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Bonitatibus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Bonitatibus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Bonitatibus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Bonitatibus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Bonitatibus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Bonitatibus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Bonitatibus. The network helps show where Peter J. Bonitatibus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter J. Bonitatibus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter J. Bonitatibus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter J. Bonitatibus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter J. Bonitatibus. Peter J. Bonitatibus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 4
4 1
5 11
6 165
7 46
8 79
9 19
10 49
11 23
12 35
13 96
14 9
15 61
16 72
17 25
18 30
19
A Recyclable Ru-Based Metathesis Catalystbreakdown →
775
20 79

About Peter J. Bonitatibus

Peter J. Bonitatibus is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (16 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (14 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (208 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.9k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (589 citations). Peter J. Bonitatibus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and India. Frequent co-authors include Amir H. Hoveyda, Joseph P. A. Harrity, Jason S. Kingsbury, Richard R. Schrock, Paul F. FitzGerald, Robert E. Colborn, Andrew S. Torres, Marc L. Snapper, John A. Tallarico and Benjamin M. Yeh. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026