David Scott
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Selwyn RichardsTanya FornerisSteven J. DanishStephen B. LevineGeorge LammingSandra Leaton Gray
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper)
- Journals
- Educational Philosophy and TheoryAcademic PsychiatryJournal of the American Oriental Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
David Scott
13 papers receiving 279 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Psychiatry and Mental health 165
- Pharmacology 129
- Sociology and Political Science 61
- Occupational Therapy 51
- Political Science and International Relations 43
Countries citing papers authored by David Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of David Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Scott. The network helps show where David Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Scott. David Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Setting goals, solving problems, and seeking social support: developing adolescents' abilities through a life skills program. | 31 |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 176 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About David Scott
David Scott is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Anthropology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (51 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (165 citations) and Pharmacology (129 citations). David Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Selwyn Richards, Tanya Forneris, Steven J. Danish, Stephen B. Levine, George Lamming and Sandra Leaton Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Philosophy and Theory, Academic Psychiatry and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.