Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
1995714 citationsDavid SallyRationality and Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of David Sally's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sally with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sally more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sally. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sally. The network helps show where David Sally may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Sally
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Sally.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Sally based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Sally. David Sally is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderson, Christopher J. & David Sally. (2014). The numbers game: why everything you know about football is wrong. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).52 indexed citations
Hill, Elisabeth L., David Sally, & Uta Frith. (2004). Does mentalising ability influence cooperative decision-making in a social dilemma? Introspective evidence from a study of adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. UCL Discovery (University College London).15 indexed citations
4.
Guthrie, Chris & David Sally. (2004). The Impact of the Impact Bias on Negotiation. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
5.
Sally, David. (2004). Game Theory: Game Theory Behaves. eYLS (Yale Law School). 87(4). 16.1 indexed citations
6.
Guthrie, Chris & David Sally. (2004). Impact Bias: The Impact of the Impact Bias on Negotiation. Marquette law review. 87(4). 19.1 indexed citations
7.
Sally, David. (2004). Theory of Mind: Social Maneuvers and Theory of Mind. eYLS (Yale Law School). 87(4). 27.1 indexed citations
8.
Hill, Elisabeth L., David Sally, & Uta Frith. (2004). Investigating the influence of mentalising in the Prisoner's dilemma: introspective evidence from a study of individuals with autism. UCL Discovery (University College London).
9.
Sally, David. (2003). Dressing the mind properly for the game. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 358(1431). 583–592.10 indexed citations
10.
Carlson, Kurt A. & David Sally. (2002). Thoughts That Count: Fairness and Possibilities, Intentions and Reactions. Advances in consumer research. 29(1). 79.1 indexed citations
Sally, David. (2001). On sympathy and games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 44(1). 1–30.77 indexed citations
16.
Sally, David. (2000). Confronting the Sirens: Rational Behavior in the Face of Changing Preferences. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 156(4). 684–684.8 indexed citations
Sally, David. (1995). Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas. Rationality and Society. 7(1). 58–92.714 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Sally, David. (1995). Gifts with Strings Attached. Rationality and Society. 7(4). 416–420.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.