David R. Williams
- Neurology top 0.2%
- Physiology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Andrew J. LeesJanice L. HoltonTamás RévészAlan PittmanRohan de SilvaLuke A. MasseyLaura Silveira‐MoriyamaSean S. O’Sullivan
- Topics
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (35 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (25 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (12 papers)
- Journals
- BrainNeurologyThe Lancet Neurology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David R. Williams
58 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Neurology 3.0k
- Physiology 1.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
- Neurology 855
- Molecular Biology 409
Countries citing papers authored by David R. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Williams. The network helps show where David R. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Williams. David R. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 120 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 149 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 85 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 303 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 156 | |
| 17 | Characteristics of two distinct clinical phenotypes in pathologically proven progressive supranuclear palsy: Richardson's syndrome and PSP-parkinsonismbreakdown → | 517 |
| 18 | 187 | |
| 19 | EMU Shoulder Injury Tiger Team Report | 32 |
| 20 | 11 |
About David R. Williams
David R. Williams is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology and Sensory Systems, having authored 59 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (35 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (25 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (3.0k citations), Neurology (855 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations). David R. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Lees, Janice L. Holton, Tamás Révész, Alan Pittman, Rohan de Silva, Luke A. Massey, Laura Silveira‐Moriyama, Sean S. O’Sullivan, Dominic Paviour and Linda Kilford. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Neurology and The Lancet Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.