Nature Reviews Neurology

2.3k papers and 148.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Nature Reviews Neurology in the last decades have received a total of 148.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Neurology usually cover Neurology (746 papers), Molecular Biology (464 papers) and Physiology (450 papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (289 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (226 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (225 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Neurology are Kaj Blennow, Heather Wood, Paul Edison, Fangda Leng, Clive Holmes, V. Hugh Perry, Henrik Zetterberg, Berislav V. Zloković, Chia‐Chen Liu and Guojun Bu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Neurology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Neurology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Neurology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Neurology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Neurology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Neurology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Neurology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025