David Quint
- Classics top 1%
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 6
-
- French Literature and Criticism 5
- Anthropology top 2%
- Classical Antiquity Studies 4
- Historical and Literary Studies 3
- History top 0.5%
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 5
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
-
- Diffusion and Search Dynamics 7
-
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions 4
- Co-authors
- Christopher IvicPatricia A. ParkerAjay GopinathanJ. M. SchwarzB. McH.Moumita DasWilliam J. KennedyGregory M. Grason
- Journals
- Comparative Literature (7 papers)Modern Language Quarterly (5 papers)Renaissance Quarterly (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
David Quint
61 papers receiving 623 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Classics 126
- Literature and Literary Theory 267
- Anthropology 181
- History 174
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 47
Countries citing papers authored by David Quint
This map shows the geographic impact of David Quint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Quint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Quint more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Quint
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Quint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Quint. The network helps show where David Quint may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Quint, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 12 | Fear of Falling: Icarus, Phaethon, and Lucretius in Paradise Lost | 2015 | 3 |
| 13 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 48 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 103 | |
| 19 | Creative imitation : new essays on Renaissance literature in honor of Thomas M. Greene | 1992 | 21 |
| 20 | 1989 | 1 |
About David Quint
David Quint is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 74 papers that have together received 927 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diffusion and Search Dynamics (7 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (6 papers), French Literature and Criticism (5 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (5 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (126 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (267 citations) and Anthropology (181 citations). David Quint has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Ivic, Patricia A. Parker, Ajay Gopinathan, J. M. Schwarz, B. McH., Moumita Das, William J. Kennedy, Gregory M. Grason, Silke Henkes and Yaouen Fily. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Literature, Modern Language Quarterly, Renaissance Quarterly, Scientific Reports and Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.