David Popenoe
Impact in
- Demography top 0.5%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Papers in
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 6
-
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 8
- Co-authors
- Alison McIntoshRobert WrightFrances GoldscheiderMartha ZaslowCheryl D. HayesJohn L. PalmerAlison WoodwardIvan Light
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (12 papers)Society (6 papers)Population and Development Review (5 papers)Journal of Marriage and the Family (4 papers)Social Forces (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
David Popenoe
46 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Demography 581
- Gender Studies 398
- Sociology and Political Science 864
- Health 129
- Safety Research 95
Countries citing papers authored by David Popenoe
This map shows the geographic impact of David Popenoe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Popenoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Popenoe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Popenoe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Popenoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Popenoe. The network helps show where David Popenoe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Popenoe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 6 | We Are What We See | 1998 | 2 |
| 7 | 1996 | 38 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 48 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 33 | |
| 17 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1963 | 3 |
About David Popenoe
David Popenoe is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Demography, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (1 paper), Urbanization and City Planning (1 paper), Social and Educational Sciences (1 paper), Research in Social Sciences (1 paper) and Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (581 citations), Gender Studies (398 citations), Sociology and Political Science (864 citations), Health (129 citations) and Safety Research (95 citations). David Popenoe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alison McIntosh, Robert Wright, Frances Goldscheider, Martha Zaslow, Cheryl D. Hayes, John L. Palmer, Alison Woodward, Ivan Light, Karen Oppenheim Mason and Geoffrey McNicoll. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Society, Population and Development Review, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.