Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of David Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Moore more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Moore. The network helps show where David Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Moore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Moore.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Moore based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Moore. David Moore is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Moore, David. (2010). Consumer response to affective versus deliberative advertising appeals: the role of anticipatory emotions and individual differences in savoring capacity. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
9.
Moore, David, et al.. (2008). Table of Contents. Historical Records of Australian Science. 19(1). I–I.1 indexed citations
10.
Moore, David. (2003). Network Telescopes: Tracking Denial-of-Service Attacks and Internet Worms Around the Globe.. USENIX Large Installation Systems Administration Conference.11 indexed citations
11.
Hobbs, David, et al.. (2002). Identifying and Using Hypermedia Browsing Patterns. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 11(1). 31–50.7 indexed citations
12.
Moore, David, et al.. (2001). Learning Style Theory and Computer Mediated Communication. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2001(1). 71–75.19 indexed citations
13.
Knezek, Gerald, et al.. (2000). Information and communication technologies in hands-on science: emerging trends across three nations. University of Twente Research Information. 19(3). 277–295.3 indexed citations
14.
Moore, David. (2000). A Framework for Using Multimedia Within Argumentation Systems. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 19(2). 83–98.6 indexed citations
15.
Hobbs, Dave, et al.. (1999). A Hybrid Semantic/Connectionist Approach to Adaptivity in Educational Hypermedia Systems. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 1999(1). 546–551.4 indexed citations
16.
Moore, David, et al.. (1994). Exploring the role of individual differences in affect intensity on the consumer's response to. Advances in consumer research. 21(1). 181–187.3 indexed citations
17.
Moore, David, et al.. (1994). Exploring the Role of Individual Differences in Affect Intensity on the Consumer's Response to Advertising Appeals. ACR North American Advances.5 indexed citations
18.
Moore, David, et al.. (1990). Affect Intensity As an Individual Difference Variable in Consumer Response to Advertising Appeals. ACR North American Advances.8 indexed citations
19.
Moore, David, Richard Reardon, & John C. Mowen. (1989). Source Independence in Multiple Source Advertising Appeals: the Confederate Effect. ACR North American Advances.7 indexed citations
20.
Moore, David & Scott Hoenig. (1989). Negative Emotions As Mediators of Attitudes in Advertising Appeals. ACR North American Advances.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.