David Meister
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Surgery
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 2%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gregory Z. BednyScott W. WolfeSteve K. LeeJoseph H. FeinbergDarryl B. SneagJessica RoseAmy L. LaddErin E. Butler
- Topics
- Ergonomics and Human Factors (6 papers)Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers)Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Meister
21 papers receiving 573 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Social Psychology 234
- Biomedical Engineering 142
- Surgery 142
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 135
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 69
Countries citing papers authored by David Meister
This map shows the geographic impact of David Meister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Meister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Meister more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Meister
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Meister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Meister. The network helps show where David Meister may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Meister
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Meister. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Meister based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Meister. David Meister is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | KINEMATIC AND KINETIC ANALYSIS OF THE ELITE GOLF SWING | 3 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 65 | |
| 12 | 92 | |
| 13 | 119 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Conceptual Aspects of Human Factors | 86 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Human factors : theory and practice | 51 |
| 20 | Human factors evaluation in system development | 41 |
About David Meister
David Meister is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Internal Medicine and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ergonomics and Human Factors (6 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers) and Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (135 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (19 citations) and Social Psychology (234 citations). David Meister has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregory Z. Bedny, Scott W. Wolfe, Steve K. Lee, Joseph H. Feinberg, Darryl B. Sneag, Jessica Rose, Amy L. Ladd, Erin E. Butler, Michelle G. Carlson and James T. Ninomiya. Their work appears in journals such as Muscle & Nerve, The Journal Of Hand Surgery and The Journal of Arthroplasty.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.