David Méary

601 total citations
29 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

David Méary is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Méary has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in David Méary's work include Face Recognition and Perception (19 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (6 papers). David Méary is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (19 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (6 papers). David Méary collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. David Méary's co-authors include Olivier Pascalis, Jean-Pierre Orliaguet, Édouard Gentaz, Jean Decety, Thierry Chaminade, Paul C. Quinn, Francesca Simion, Elisa Di Giorgio, Fabrice Damon and David J. Kelly and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

David Méary

29 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Méary France 13 299 181 162 126 68 29 432
Roman Feiman United States 10 281 0.9× 162 0.9× 196 1.2× 135 1.1× 24 0.4× 20 520
Jan Zwickel Germany 14 503 1.7× 314 1.7× 163 1.0× 143 1.1× 48 0.7× 21 655
Michelle L. Eisenberg United States 11 357 1.2× 142 0.8× 118 0.7× 153 1.2× 38 0.6× 13 564
Letizia Palumbo United Kingdom 18 655 2.2× 384 2.1× 308 1.9× 95 0.8× 37 0.5× 36 856
Masaharu Kato Japan 12 247 0.8× 168 0.9× 85 0.5× 143 1.1× 20 0.3× 40 428
Silvia Rigato United Kingdom 16 464 1.6× 257 1.4× 241 1.5× 143 1.1× 32 0.5× 30 708
Mélanie Perron Canada 10 297 1.0× 111 0.6× 205 1.3× 58 0.5× 45 0.7× 23 432
Enrica Menon Italy 10 630 2.1× 227 1.3× 296 1.8× 262 2.1× 122 1.8× 10 877
Kaitlin Laidlaw Canada 10 526 1.8× 200 1.1× 199 1.2× 107 0.8× 99 1.5× 13 697
Elena Geangu United Kingdom 14 255 0.9× 275 1.5× 163 1.0× 199 1.6× 26 0.4× 31 571

Countries citing papers authored by David Méary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Méary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Méary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Méary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Méary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Méary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Méary. The network helps show where David Méary may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Méary

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Méary. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Méary based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Méary. David Méary is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fort, Mathilde, Gudrun Schwarzer, Anne Vilain, et al.. (2021). Can language modulate perceptual narrowing for faces? Other-race face recognition in infants is modulated by language experience. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 46(2). 83–90. 6 indexed citations
2.
Quinn, Paul C., et al.. (2020). A developmental investigation of the other-race categorization advantage in a multiracial population: Contrasting social categorization and perceptual expertise accounts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 197. 104870–104870. 11 indexed citations
3.
Shankland, Rébecca, et al.. (2019). Food-Cal: development of a controlled database of high and low calorie food matched with non-food pictures. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. 24(6). 1041–1050. 5 indexed citations
4.
Kelly, David J., Sofia Duarte, David Méary, Markus Bindemann, & Olivier Pascalis. (2019). Infants rapidly detect human faces in complex naturalistic visual scenes. Developmental Science. 22(6). e12829–e12829. 38 indexed citations
5.
Damon, Fabrice, Zhihan Li, Wu Li, et al.. (2018). Preference for attractive faces is species-specific.. Journal of comparative psychology. 133(2). 262–271. 3 indexed citations
6.
Méary, David, et al.. (2018). Multisensory Representation of Gender in Infants: An Eye‐Tracking Study. Language Learning. 68(S1). 14–30. 4 indexed citations
7.
Méary, David, et al.. (2017). Modifications of Visual Field Asymmetries for Face Categorization in Early Deaf Adults: A Study With Chimeric Faces. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 30–30. 9 indexed citations
8.
Damon, Fabrice, David Méary, Paul C. Quinn, et al.. (2017). Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 46303–46303. 25 indexed citations
9.
Kandel, Sonia, et al.. (2016). The Impact of Early Bilingualism on Face Recognition Processes. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1080–1080. 17 indexed citations
10.
Rämä, Pia, et al.. (2016). Eye movement patterns and visual attention during scene viewing in 3- to 12-month-olds. Visual Neuroscience. 33. E014–E014. 23 indexed citations
11.
Dupierrix, Eve, Anne Hillairet de Boisferon, David Méary, et al.. (2014). Preference for human eyes in human infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 123. 138–146. 36 indexed citations
12.
Méary, David, et al.. (2014). Seeing two faces together: preference formation in humans and rhesus macaques. Animal Cognition. 17(5). 1107–1119. 16 indexed citations
13.
Kaminski, Gwenaël, David Méary, Martial Mermillod, & Édouard Gentaz. (2011). Is it a he or a she? Behavioral and computational approaches to sex categorization. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 73(5). 1344–1349. 16 indexed citations
14.
Méary, David, Letizia Leocani, Raffaella Chieffo, et al.. (2010). Probing the Control Processes of the Motor System. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 59(10). 2488–2495. 1 indexed citations
15.
Méary, David, Gabriel Baud‐Bovy, Raffaella Chieffo, et al.. (2009). Robot-assisted assessment of sensorimotor control: A case study. 172–176. 3 indexed citations
16.
Méary, David, et al.. (2007). Four-Day-Old Human Neonates Look Longer at Non-Biological Motions of a Single Point-of-Light. PLoS ONE. 2(1). e186–e186. 32 indexed citations
17.
Bidet-Ildei, Christel, David Méary, & Jean-Pierre Orliaguet. (2007). Visual preference for isochronic movement does not necessarily emerge from movement kinematics: A challenge for the motor simulation theory. Neuroscience Letters. 430(3). 236–240. 5 indexed citations
18.
Bidet-Ildei, Christel, David Méary, & Jean-Pierre Orliaguet. (2006). Visual Perception of Elliptic movements in 7- to-11-year-old children : Influence of Motor Rules. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 19, Vol. 2, 2006. 8 indexed citations
19.
Méary, David, et al.. (2004). Influence of Motor Disorders on the Visual Perception of Human Movements in a Case of Peripheral Dysgraphia. Neurocase. 10(3). 223–232. 22 indexed citations
20.
Chaminade, Thierry, David Méary, Jean-Pierre Orliaguet, & Jean Decety. (2001). Is perceptual anticipation a motor simulation? A PET study. Neuroreport. 12(17). 3669–3674. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026