David Kyle Johnson
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Free Will and Agency
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Papers in
- Philosophy 13
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 11
- War, Ethics, and Justification 3
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 2
-
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 5
- Journals
- Sophia (3 papers)Religions (2 papers)Philosophia Christi (1 paper)Philosophical Topics (1 paper)Religious Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Kyle Johnson
17 papers receiving 107 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Philosophy 93
- Cognitive Neuroscience 70
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
- History and Philosophy of Science 8
- General Decision Sciences 2
Countries citing papers authored by David Kyle Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of David Kyle Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Kyle Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Kyle Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Kyle Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Kyle Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Kyle Johnson. The network helps show where David Kyle Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Kyle Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 11 | Introducing philosophy through pop culture : from Socrates to South Park, Hume to House | 2010 | 2 |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | Inception and Philosophy: Because It's Never Just a Dream | 2011 | 2 |
| 14 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 19 | Divine omniscience and the fatalist dilemma. | 2013 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0 |
About David Kyle Johnson
David Kyle Johnson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (11 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Evolution and Science Education (2 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (93 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (70 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations) and General Decision Sciences (2 citations). David Kyle Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. McKay and William Irwin. Their work appears in journals such as Sophia, Religions, Philosophia Christi, Philosophical Topics and Religious Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.