Thomas Raleigh

500 total citations
19 papers, 136 citations indexed

About

Thomas Raleigh is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Raleigh has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 136 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 8 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Thomas Raleigh's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers). Thomas Raleigh is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers). Thomas Raleigh collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Arab Emirates and Luxembourg. Thomas Raleigh's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly and Synthese.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Raleigh

18 papers receiving 124 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Raleigh Germany	7	86	70	58	23	12	19	136
Guy Longworth United Kingdom	7	134 1.6×	92 1.3×	53 0.9×	22 1.0×	8 0.7×	25	184
Avner Baz United States	7	133 1.5×	80 1.1×	31 0.5×	37 1.6×	7 0.6×	26	177
Douglas Lavin United Kingdom	5	123 1.4×	58 0.8×	77 1.3×	11 0.5×	14 1.2×	7	141
Andrew Moon United States	9	163 1.9×	64 0.9×	75 1.3×	19 0.8×	7 0.6×	15	175
Luca Ferrero United States	7	104 1.2×	32 0.5×	77 1.3×	14 0.6×	17 1.4×	17	146
Michael Pace United States	8	105 1.2×	51 0.7×	77 1.3×	17 0.7×	26 2.2×	9	157
Denis McManus United Kingdom	8	115 1.3×	131 1.9×	46 0.8×	17 0.7×	5 0.4×	28	190
Stacey Swain United States	2	146 1.7×	50 0.7×	121 2.1×	32 1.4×	6 0.5×	2	175
Michael Pendlebury South Africa	7	78 0.9×	82 1.2×	26 0.4×	35 1.5×	8 0.7×	37	140
Hans Johann Glock United Kingdom	5	60 0.7×	35 0.5×	21 0.4×	24 1.0×	7 0.6×	13	100

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Raleigh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Raleigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Raleigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Raleigh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Raleigh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Raleigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Raleigh. The network helps show where Thomas Raleigh may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

1.

Raleigh, Thomas, et al.. (2025). Clarifying the Opacity of Neural Networks. Minds and Machines. 35(4). 1 indexed citations

2.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2024). The Emptiness of Naturalism. Philosophy. 99(4). 597–623. 1 indexed citations

3.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2022). Perceptual Content, Phenomenal Contrasts, and Externalism. The Journal of Philosophy. 119(11). 602–627. 2 indexed citations

4.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2021). A new anti-expertise dilemma. Synthese. 199(3-4). 5551–5569.

5.

Raleigh, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Perceptual Experience and Degrees of Belief. The Philosophical Quarterly. 71(2). 378–406. 4 indexed citations

6.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2019). Science, substance and spatial appearances. Philosophical Studies. 177(8). 2097–2114. 1 indexed citations

7.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2019). Suspending is believing. Synthese. 198(3). 2449–2474. 28 indexed citations

8.

Raleigh, Thomas, et al.. (2019). Acquaintance: New Essays. 17 indexed citations

9.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2018). Visual acquaintance, action and the explanatory gap. Synthese. 198(S17). 4081–4106. 2 indexed citations

10.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2018). On Silhouettes, Surfaces, and Sorensen. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

11.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2018). Tolerant enactivist cognitive science. Philosophical Explorations. 21(2). 226–244. 3 indexed citations

12.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2016). Against an inferentialist dogma. Synthese. 194(4). 1397–1421. 3 indexed citations

13.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2016). Another Argument Against Uniqueness. The Philosophical Quarterly. pqw058–pqw058. 17 indexed citations

14.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2014). A New Approach to 'Perfect' Hallucinations. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 21. 10 indexed citations

15.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2013). Belief Norms and Blindspots. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 51(2). 243–269. 13 indexed citations

16.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2013). Phenomenology without Representation. European Journal of Philosophy. 23(4). 1209–1237. 17 indexed citations

17.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2011). Visual Experience and Demonstrative Thought. Disputatio. 4(30). 171–193. 4 indexed citations

18.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2009). UNDERSTANDING HOW EXPERIENCE "SEEMS". PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 5(2). 3 indexed citations

19.

Raleigh, Thomas. (2002). Lord Curzon in India. Being a Selection from his Speeches as Viceroy & Governor-General of India, 1898-1905. With a Portrait, Explanatory Notes and an Index, and with an Introduction. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact